ghsa-xhj2-g5qf-66wr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:28
Modified
2022-05-17 05:28
Details

The Diffie-Hellman key-exchange implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8, when FIPS mode is enabled, does not properly validate a public parameter, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain the shared secret key by modifying network traffic, a related issue to CVE-2011-1923.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-5095"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-06-20T17:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Diffie-Hellman key-exchange implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8, when FIPS mode is enabled, does not properly validate a public parameter, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain the shared secret key by modifying network traffic, a related issue to CVE-2011-1923.",
  "id": "GHSA-xhj2-g5qf-66wr",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:28:31Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:28:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-5095"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://discussions.nessus.org/thread/3381"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/Papers/psandqs.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.nessus.org/plugins/index.php?view=single\u0026id=53360"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.