ghsa-xhj3-gjcc-48pc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:24
Modified
2022-05-13 01:24
Severity ?
Details
Integer signedness error in the CIFSFindNext function in fs/cifs/cifssmb.c in the Linux kernel before 3.1 allows remote CIFS servers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a large length value in a response to a read request for a directory.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-3191" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-05-24T23:55:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Integer signedness error in the CIFSFindNext function in fs/cifs/cifssmb.c in the Linux kernel before 3.1 allows remote CIFS servers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a large length value in a response to a read request for a directory.", "id": "GHSA-xhj3-gjcc-48pc", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:24:57Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:24:57Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-3191" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/9438fabb73eb48055b58b89fc51e0bc4db22fabd" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732869" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=9438fabb73eb48055b58b89fc51e0bc4db22fabd" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=9438fabb73eb48055b58b89fc51e0bc4db22fabd" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/08/24/2" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.