GHSA-XHW6-HJC9-679M

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-01-08 00:36 – Updated: 2023-09-26 17:27
VLAI?
Summary
Pac4j token validation bypass if OpenID Connect provider supports none algorithm
Details

If an OpenID Connect provider supports the “none” algorithm (i.e., tokens with no signature), pac4j v5.3.0 (and prior) does not refuse it without an explicit configuration on its side or for the “idtoken” response type which is not secure and violates the OpenID Core Specification. The "none" algorithm does not require any signature verification when validating the ID tokens, which allows the attacker to bypass the token validation by injecting a malformed ID token using "none" as the value of "alg" key in the header with an empty signature value.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.pac4j:pac4j-oidc"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.5.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.pac4j:pac4j-oidc"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "5.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.3.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-44878"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-01-07T22:41:34Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-01-06T13:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "If an OpenID Connect provider supports the \u201cnone\u201d algorithm (i.e., tokens with no signature), pac4j v5.3.0 (and prior) does not refuse it without an explicit configuration on its side or for the \u201cidtoken\u201d response type which is not secure and violates the OpenID Core Specification. The \"none\" algorithm does not require any signature verification when validating the ID tokens, which allows the attacker to bypass the token validation by injecting a malformed ID token using \"none\" as the value of \"alg\" key in the header with an empty signature value.",
  "id": "GHSA-xhw6-hjc9-679m",
  "modified": "2023-09-26T17:27:45Z",
  "published": "2022-01-08T00:36:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-44878"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pac4j/pac4j/commit/09684e0de1c4753d22c53b8135d4ef61cfda76f7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pac4j/pac4j/commit/22b82ffd702a132d9f09da60362fc6264fc281ae"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pac4j/pac4j/commit/9c87bbc536ed5d05f940ae015403120df2935589"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/pac4j/pac4j"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#IDToken"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.pac4j.org/4.5.x/docs/release-notes.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.pac4j.org/blog/cve_2021_44878_is_this_serious.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Pac4j token validation bypass if OpenID Connect provider supports none algorithm"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…