GHSA-XJP3-RC99-3W6G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:07 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:07
VLAI?
Details

Buffer overflow in the DumpSysVar function in var.c in Remind before 3.1.15 allows attackers to have unspecified impact via a long name.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-5957"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-09-28T20:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in the DumpSysVar function in var.c in Remind before 3.1.15 allows attackers to have unspecified impact via a long name.",
  "id": "GHSA-xjp3-rc99-3w6g",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T02:07:40Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:07:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-5957"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-09/msg00025.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/remind-fans/2015/003172.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/07/29/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/08/07/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/76099"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…