ghsa-xmjp-8ccm-cf6h
Vulnerability from github
OpenSSL 1.1.1 introduced a rewritten random number generator (RNG). This was intended to include protection in the event of a fork() system call in order to ensure that the parent and child processes did not share the same RNG state. However this protection was not being used in the default case. A partial mitigation for this issue is that the output from a high precision timer is mixed into the RNG state so the likelihood of a parent and child process sharing state is significantly reduced. If an application already calls OPENSSL_init_crypto() explicitly using OPENSSL_INIT_ATFORK then this problem does not occur at all. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c).
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2019-1549", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-330", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2019-09-10T17:15:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "OpenSSL 1.1.1 introduced a rewritten random number generator (RNG). This was intended to include protection in the event of a fork() system call in order to ensure that the parent and child processes did not share the same RNG state. However this protection was not being used in the default case. A partial mitigation for this issue is that the output from a high precision timer is mixed into the RNG state so the likelihood of a parent and child process sharing state is significantly reduced. If an application already calls OPENSSL_init_crypto() explicitly using OPENSSL_INIT_ATFORK then this problem does not occur at all. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c).", id: "GHSA-xmjp-8ccm-cf6h", modified: "2024-04-04T01:55:02Z", published: "2022-05-24T16:55:53Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-1549", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20190910.txt", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4539", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4376-1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K44070243?utm_source=f5support&utm_medium=RSS", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K44070243?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K44070243", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190919-0002", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Oct/1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZN4VVQJ3JDCHGIHV4Y2YTXBYQZ6PWQ7E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GY6SNRJP2S7Y42GIIDO3HXPNMDYN2U3A", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZN4VVQJ3JDCHGIHV4Y2YTXBYQZ6PWQ7E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GY6SNRJP2S7Y42GIIDO3HXPNMDYN2U3A", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1b0fe00e2704b5e20334a16d3c9099d1ba2ef1be", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=1b0fe00e2704b5e20334a16d3c9099d1ba2ef1be", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.