GHSA-XMPG-VW67-W2QC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:17 – Updated: 2024-03-21 03:32
VLAI?
Details
** DISPUTED ** Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on the eSoft InstaGate EX2 UTM device before firmware 3.1.20070615 allows remote attackers to perform privileged actions as administrators. NOTE: the vendor disputes the distribution of the vulnerable software, stating that it was a custom build for a former customer.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-3786"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-07-15T23:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "** DISPUTED ** Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on the eSoft InstaGate EX2 UTM device before firmware 3.1.20070615 allows remote attackers to perform privileged actions as administrators. NOTE: the vendor disputes the distribution of the vulnerable software, stating that it was a custom build for a former customer.",
"id": "GHSA-xmpg-vw67-w2qc",
"modified": "2024-03-21T03:32:56Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:17:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-3786"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/35372"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://labs.calyptix.com/CX-2007-05.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://labs.calyptix.com/CX-2007-05.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/38174"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26005"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.eweek.com/article2/0%2C1759%2C2154646%2C00.asp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2154646,00.asp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/473663/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2539"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…