GHSA-XPCF-PG52-R92G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-08 00:17 – Updated: 2026-04-08 15:34Summary
ipRestriction() does not canonicalize IPv4-mapped IPv6 client addresses (e.g. ::ffff:127.0.0.1) before applying IPv4 allow or deny rules. In environments such as Node.js dual-stack, this can cause IPv4 rules to fail to match, leading to unintended authorization behavior.
Details
The middleware classifies client addresses based on their textual form. Addresses containing ":" are treated as IPv6, including IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses such as ::ffff:127.0.0.1. These addresses are not normalized to IPv4 before matching.
As a result:
- IPv4 static rules (e.g.
127.0.0.1) do not match because the raw string differs - IPv4 CIDR rules (e.g.
127.0.0.0/8,10.0.0.0/8) are skipped because the address is treated as IPv6
For example, with:
denyList: ['127.0.0.1']
a request from 127.0.0.1 may be represented as ::ffff:127.0.0.1 and bypass the deny rule.
This behavior commonly occurs in Node.js environments where IPv4 clients are exposed as IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses.
Impact
Applications that rely on IPv4-based ipRestriction() rules may incorrectly allow or deny requests.
In affected deployments, a denied IPv4 client may bypass access restrictions. Conversely, legitimate clients may be rejected when using IPv4 allow lists.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "hono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.12.12"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-39409"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-180"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-08T00:17:14Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-08T15:16:14Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\n`ipRestriction()` does not canonicalize IPv4-mapped IPv6 client addresses (e.g. `::ffff:127.0.0.1`) before applying IPv4 allow or deny rules. In environments such as Node.js dual-stack, this can cause IPv4 rules to fail to match, leading to unintended authorization behavior.\n\n## Details\n\nThe middleware classifies client addresses based on their textual form. Addresses containing \"`:`\" are treated as IPv6, including IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses such as `::ffff:127.0.0.1`. These addresses are not normalized to IPv4 before matching.\n\nAs a result:\n\n* IPv4 static rules (e.g. `127.0.0.1`) do not match because the raw string differs\n* IPv4 CIDR rules (e.g. `127.0.0.0/8`, `10.0.0.0/8`) are skipped because the address is treated as IPv6\n\nFor example, with:\n\n`denyList: [\u0027127.0.0.1\u0027]`\n\na request from `127.0.0.1` may be represented as `::ffff:127.0.0.1` and bypass the deny rule.\n\nThis behavior commonly occurs in Node.js environments where IPv4 clients are exposed as IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses.\n\n## Impact\n\nApplications that rely on IPv4-based `ipRestriction()` rules may incorrectly allow or deny requests.\n\nIn affected deployments, a denied IPv4 client may bypass access restrictions. Conversely, legitimate clients may be rejected when using IPv4 allow lists.",
"id": "GHSA-xpcf-pg52-r92g",
"modified": "2026-04-08T15:34:40Z",
"published": "2026-04-08T00:17:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-xpcf-pg52-r92g"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39409"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/48fa2233bc092f650119f42df043050737cabf39"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/releases/tag/v4.12.12"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Hono has incorrect IP matching in ipRestriction() for IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.