GHSA-XPR9-PCWR-H574

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-01 15:30 – Updated: 2026-05-03 09:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: xilinx: axienet: Fix BQL accounting for multi-BD TX packets

When a TX packet spans multiple buffer descriptors (scatter-gather), axienet_free_tx_chain sums the per-BD actual length from descriptor status into a caller-provided accumulator. That sum is reset on each NAPI poll. If the BDs for a single packet complete across different polls, the earlier bytes are lost and never credited to BQL. This causes BQL to think bytes are permanently in-flight, eventually stalling the TX queue.

The SKB pointer is stored only on the last BD of a packet. When that BD completes, use skb->len for the byte count instead of summing per-BD status lengths. This matches netdev_sent_queue(), which debits skb->len, and naturally survives across polls because no partial packet contributes to the accumulator.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-43031"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-01T15:16:47Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: xilinx: axienet: Fix BQL accounting for multi-BD TX packets\n\nWhen a TX packet spans multiple buffer descriptors (scatter-gather),\naxienet_free_tx_chain sums the per-BD actual length from descriptor\nstatus into a caller-provided accumulator. That sum is reset on each\nNAPI poll. If the BDs for a single packet complete across different\npolls, the earlier bytes are lost and never credited to BQL. This\ncauses BQL to think bytes are permanently in-flight, eventually\nstalling the TX queue.\n\nThe SKB pointer is stored only on the last BD of a packet. When that\nBD completes, use skb-\u003elen for the byte count instead of summing\nper-BD status lengths. This matches netdev_sent_queue(), which debits\nskb-\u003elen, and naturally survives across polls because no partial\npacket contributes to the accumulator.",
  "id": "GHSA-xpr9-pcwr-h574",
  "modified": "2026-05-03T09:33:10Z",
  "published": "2026-05-01T15:30:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43031"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2a0323a913109b52bfc9f5ea7b92a1b249e07d3e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c3a6b9020c01fde7b22e8550105de0b59904f61"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1978d03e86785872871bff9c2623174b10740de"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…