GHSA-XQCP-9P67-2J64
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-18 12:30 – Updated: 2025-11-17 21:31
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cifs: Fix memory leak when using fscache
If we hit the 'index == next_cached' case, we leak a refcount on the struct page. Fix this by using readahead_folio() which takes care of the refcount for you.
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-50107"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-401"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-18T11:15:40Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncifs: Fix memory leak when using fscache\n\nIf we hit the \u0027index == next_cached\u0027 case, we leak a refcount on the\nstruct page. Fix this by using readahead_folio() which takes care of\nthe refcount for you.",
"id": "GHSA-xqcp-9p67-2j64",
"modified": "2025-11-17T21:31:18Z",
"published": "2025-06-18T12:30:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50107"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7105b4047481bc2950fb767cff328d8b75292c0f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae497726cd090673a4d20ac725ccc2de8067a7a5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6f62f81b488d00afaa86bae26c6ce9ab12c709e"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…