GHSA-XQWG-JRCF-R9XG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-24 12:30 – Updated: 2025-12-24 12:30
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
accel/amdxdna: Fix an integer overflow in aie2_query_ctx_status_array()
The unpublished smatch static checker reported a warning.
drivers/accel/amdxdna/aie2_pci.c:904 aie2_query_ctx_status_array() warn: potential user controlled sizeof overflow 'args->num_element * args->element_size' '1-u32max(user) * 1-u32max(user)'
Even this will not cause a real issue, it is better to put a reasonable limitation for element_size and num_element. Add condition to make sure the input element_size <= 4K and num_element <= 1K.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-68731"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-24T11:16:02Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naccel/amdxdna: Fix an integer overflow in aie2_query_ctx_status_array()\n\nThe unpublished smatch static checker reported a warning.\n\ndrivers/accel/amdxdna/aie2_pci.c:904 aie2_query_ctx_status_array()\nwarn: potential user controlled sizeof overflow\n\u0027args-\u003enum_element * args-\u003eelement_size\u0027 \u00271-u32max(user) * 1-u32max(user)\u0027\n\nEven this will not cause a real issue, it is better to put a reasonable\nlimitation for element_size and num_element. Add condition to make sure\nthe input element_size \u003c= 4K and num_element \u003c= 1K.",
"id": "GHSA-xqwg-jrcf-r9xg",
"modified": "2025-12-24T12:30:30Z",
"published": "2025-12-24T12:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68731"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/359653edd5374fbba28f93043554dcc494aee85f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9e16c8bf9aebf629344cfd4cd5e3dc7d8c3f7d82"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…