ghsa-xr2r-hh4x-gv58
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:09
Modified
2022-05-13 01:09
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Details

The xmlBufAttrSerializeTxtContent function in xmlsave.c in libxml2 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and application crash) via a non-UTF-8 attribute value, related to serialization. NOTE: this vulnerability may be a duplicate of CVE-2016-3627.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2016-4483",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-502",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2017-04-11T16:59:00Z",
      severity: "HIGH",
   },
   details: "The xmlBufAttrSerializeTxtContent function in xmlsave.c in libxml2 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and application crash) via a non-UTF-8 attribute value, related to serialization.  NOTE: this vulnerability may be a duplicate of CVE-2016-3627.",
   id: "GHSA-xr2r-hh4x-gv58",
   modified: "2022-05-13T01:09:05Z",
   published: "2022-05-13T01:09:05Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-4483",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.gnome.org/browse/libxml2/commit/?id=c97750d11bb8b6f3303e7131fe526a61ac65bcfd",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-37",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-18",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2957.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3593",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/03/8",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/04/7",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/07/4",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/07/5",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2016-3090568.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/90013",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036348",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.