GHSA-XR73-JQ5P-CH8R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-19 18:13 – Updated: 2025-11-19 18:59Summary
When authenticating with client_id and client_secret to an OAuth provider, authentik creates a service account for the provider. In previous authentik versions, authentication for this account was possible even when the account was deactivated. Other permissions are correctly applied and federation with other providers still take assigned policies correctly into account.
Patches
authentik 2025.8.5 and 2025.10.2 fix this issue, for other versions the workaround below can be used.
Workarounds
You can add a policy to your application that explicitly checks if the service account is still valid, and deny access if not.
return request.user.is_active
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Email us at security@goauthentik.io.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "goauthentik.io"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.0.0-20251119140106-9dbdfc3f1be0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-64521"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-286",
"CWE-289"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-11-19T18:13:03Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-19T17:15:52Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nWhen authenticating with `client_id` and `client_secret` to an OAuth provider, authentik creates a service account for the provider. In previous authentik versions, authentication for this account was possible even when the account was deactivated. Other permissions are correctly applied and federation with other providers still take assigned policies correctly into account.\n\n### Patches\n\nauthentik 2025.8.5 and 2025.10.2 fix this issue, for other versions the workaround below can be used.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nYou can add a policy to your application that explicitly checks if the service account is still valid, and deny access if not.\n\n```python\nreturn request.user.is_active\n```\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\n- Email us at [security@goauthentik.io](mailto:security@goauthentik.io).",
"id": "GHSA-xr73-jq5p-ch8r",
"modified": "2025-11-19T18:59:53Z",
"published": "2025-11-19T18:13:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/security/advisories/GHSA-xr73-jq5p-ch8r"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-64521"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/commit/9dbdfc3f1be0f1be36f8efce2442897b2a54a71c"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "authentik allows a deactivated Service account to authenticate to OAuth"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.