GHSA-XRCW-CGG9-MJ7C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:16 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:16
VLAI?
Details
functions/imap_general.php in SquirrelMail, as used in Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 4 and 5, does not properly handle 8-bit characters in passwords, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (disk consumption) by making many IMAP login attempts with different usernames, leading to the creation of many preference files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2010-2813.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-2124"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-01-18T11:48:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "functions/imap_general.php in SquirrelMail, as used in Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 4 and 5, does not properly handle 8-bit characters in passwords, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (disk consumption) by making many IMAP login attempts with different usernames, leading to the creation of many preference files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2010-2813.",
"id": "GHSA-xrcw-cgg9-mj7c",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:16:57Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:16:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2124"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814671"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0126.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51730"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/20/22"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…