ghsa-xrhm-4gj9-6xfq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 17:44
Modified
2022-05-01 17:44
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the arj.ppl module in the OnDemand Scanner in Kaspersky Anti-Virus, Anti-Virus for Workstations, and Anti-Virus for File Servers 6.0, and Internet Security 6.0 before Maintenance Pack 2 build 6.0.2.614 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted ARJ archives.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-0445" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-04-06T00:19:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the arj.ppl module in the OnDemand Scanner in Kaspersky Anti-Virus, Anti-Virus for Workstations, and Anti-Virus for File Servers 6.0, and Internet Security 6.0 before Maintenance Pack 2 build 6.0.2.614 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted ARJ archives.", "id": "GHSA-xrhm-4gj9-6xfq", "modified": "2022-05-01T17:44:15Z", "published": "2022-05-01T17:44:15Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-0445" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/33489" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24778" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kaspersky.com/technews?id=203038693" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kaspersky.com/technews?id=203038694" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/464878/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23346" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017882" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017883" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1268" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-07-013.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.