GHSA-XRPW-HMF5-CH3X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:34 – Updated: 2024-03-21 03:33
VLAI?
Details
** DISPUTED ** An inaccurate frame deduplication process in ChirpStack Network Server 3.9.0 allows a malicious gateway to perform uplink Denial of Service via malformed frequency attributes in CollectAndCallOnceCollect in internal/uplink/collect.go. NOTE: the vendor's position is that there are no "guarantees that allowing untrusted LoRa gateways to the network should still result in a secure network."
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-28349"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-11-09T01:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "** DISPUTED ** An inaccurate frame deduplication process in ChirpStack Network Server 3.9.0 allows a malicious gateway to perform uplink Denial of Service via malformed frequency attributes in CollectAndCallOnceCollect in internal/uplink/collect.go. NOTE: the vendor\u0027s position is that there are no \"guarantees that allowing untrusted LoRa gateways to the network should still result in a secure network.\"",
"id": "GHSA-xrpw-hmf5-ch3x",
"modified": "2024-03-21T03:33:56Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:34:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-28349"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/brocaar/chirpstack-network-server/commit/874fc1a9b01045ebe8a340f0bb01ed19e8256e60"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/brocaar/chirpstack-network-server/commit/f996bb0c6c85281b5658f59ff09db1b4a73db453"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cyberark.com/resources/threat-research-blog/lorawan-mqtt-what-to-know-when-securing-your-iot-network"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…