GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GSD-2003-0264

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:22
Details
Multiple buffer overflows in SLMail 5.1.0.4420 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long EHLO argument to slmail.exe, (2) a long XTRN argument to slmail.exe, (3) a long string to POPPASSWD, or (4) a long password to the POP3 server.
Aliases
Aliases

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2003-0264",
    "description": "Multiple buffer overflows in SLMail 5.1.0.4420 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long EHLO argument to slmail.exe, (2) a long XTRN argument to slmail.exe, (3) a long string to POPPASSWD, or (4) a long password to the POP3 server.",
    "id": "GSD-2003-0264",
    "references": [
      "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/cve/CVE-2003-0264"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2003-0264"
      ],
      "details": "Multiple buffer overflows in SLMail 5.1.0.4420 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long EHLO argument to slmail.exe, (2) a long XTRN argument to slmail.exe, (3) a long string to POPPASSWD, or (4) a long password to the POP3 server.",
      "id": "GSD-2003-0264",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:22:13.523255Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2003-0264",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "Multiple buffer overflows in SLMail 5.1.0.4420 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long EHLO argument to slmail.exe, (2) a long XTRN argument to slmail.exe, (3) a long string to POPPASSWD, or (4) a long password to the POP3 server."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "20030507 Multiple Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in SLMail (#NISR07052003A)",
            "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
            "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=105232506011335\u0026w=2"
          },
          {
            "name": "20030507 Multiple Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in SLMail (#NISR07052003A)",
            "refsource": "NTBUGTRAQ",
            "url": "http://marc.info/?l=ntbugtraq\u0026m=105233360321895\u0026w=2"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://www.nextgenss.com/advisories/slmail-vulns.txt",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://www.nextgenss.com/advisories/slmail-vulns.txt"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/161526/SLMail-5.1.0.4420-Remote-Code-Execution.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/161526/SLMail-5.1.0.4420-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:seattle_lab_software:slmail:5.1.0.4420:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2003-0264"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Multiple buffer overflows in SLMail 5.1.0.4420 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long EHLO argument to slmail.exe, (2) a long XTRN argument to slmail.exe, (3) a long string to POPPASSWD, or (4) a long password to the POP3 server."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "http://www.nextgenss.com/advisories/slmail-vulns.txt",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.nextgenss.com/advisories/slmail-vulns.txt"
            },
            {
              "name": "20030507 Multiple Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in SLMail (#NISR07052003A)",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=105232506011335\u0026w=2"
            },
            {
              "name": "20030507 Multiple Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in SLMail (#NISR07052003A)",
              "refsource": "NTBUGTRAQ",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://marc.info/?l=ntbugtraq\u0026m=105233360321895\u0026w=2"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/161526/SLMail-5.1.0.4420-Remote-Code-Execution.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/161526/SLMail-5.1.0.4420-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
          "impactScore": 6.4,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": true,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "HIGH",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2021-02-24T17:15Z",
      "publishedDate": "2003-05-27T04:00Z"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…