GSD-2004-2654

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:22
Details
The clientAbortBody function in client_side.c in Squid Web Proxy Cache before 2.6 STABLE6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via unspecified vectors that trigger a null dereference. NOTE: in a followup advisory, a researcher claimed that the issue was a buffer overflow that was not fixed in STABLE6. However, the vendor's bug report clearly shows that the researcher later retracted this claim, because the tested product was actually STABLE5.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2004-2654
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2004-2654",
    "description": "The clientAbortBody function in client_side.c in Squid Web Proxy Cache before 2.6 STABLE6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via unspecified vectors that trigger a null dereference.  NOTE: in a followup advisory, a researcher claimed that the issue was a buffer overflow that was not fixed in STABLE6. However, the vendor\u0027s bug report clearly shows that the researcher later retracted this claim, because the tested product was actually STABLE5.",
    "id": "GSD-2004-2654"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2004-2654"
      ],
      "details": "The clientAbortBody function in client_side.c in Squid Web Proxy Cache before 2.6 STABLE6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via unspecified vectors that trigger a null dereference.  NOTE: in a followup advisory, a researcher claimed that the issue was a buffer overflow that was not fixed in STABLE6. However, the vendor\u0027s bug report clearly shows that the researcher later retracted this claim, because the tested product was actually STABLE5.",
      "id": "GSD-2004-2654",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:22:55.045613Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2004-2654",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "The clientAbortBody function in client_side.c in Squid Web Proxy Cache before 2.6 STABLE6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via unspecified vectors that trigger a null dereference.  NOTE: in a followup advisory, a researcher claimed that the issue was a buffer overflow that was not fixed in STABLE6. However, the vendor\u0027s bug report clearly shows that the researcher later retracted this claim, because the tested product was actually STABLE5."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=972",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=972"
          },
          {
            "name": "1011214",
            "refsource": "SECTRACK",
            "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1011214"
          },
          {
            "name": "9801",
            "refsource": "OSVDB",
            "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/9801"
          },
          {
            "name": "20060223 old Squid clientAbortBody issue - NOT an overflow?",
            "refsource": "VIM",
            "url": "http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2006-February/000570.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "12754",
            "refsource": "SECUNIA",
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12754"
          },
          {
            "name": "12508",
            "refsource": "SECUNIA",
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12508"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://www.securitylab.ru/47881.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://www.securitylab.ru/47881.html"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:squid:squid:2.5_stable5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2004-2654"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "The clientAbortBody function in client_side.c in Squid Web Proxy Cache before 2.6 STABLE6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via unspecified vectors that trigger a null dereference.  NOTE: in a followup advisory, a researcher claimed that the issue was a buffer overflow that was not fixed in STABLE6. However, the vendor\u0027s bug report clearly shows that the researcher later retracted this claim, because the tested product was actually STABLE5."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=972",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=972"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.securitylab.ru/47881.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.securitylab.ru/47881.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "20060223 old Squid clientAbortBody issue - NOT an overflow?",
              "refsource": "VIM",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2006-February/000570.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "9801",
              "refsource": "OSVDB",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/9801"
            },
            {
              "name": "1011214",
              "refsource": "SECTRACK",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1011214"
            },
            {
              "name": "12508",
              "refsource": "SECUNIA",
              "tags": [
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12508"
            },
            {
              "name": "12754",
              "refsource": "SECUNIA",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12754"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "baseScore": 5.0,
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2008-09-05T20:44Z",
      "publishedDate": "2004-12-31T05:00Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.