GSD-2005-3058

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:20
Details
Interpretation conflict in Fortinet FortiGate 2.8, running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, allows remote attackers to bypass the URL blocker via an (1) HTTP request terminated with a line feed (LF) and not carriage return line feed (CRLF) or (2) HTTP request with no Host field, which is still processed by most web servers without violating RFC2616.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2005-3058
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2005-3058",
    "description": "Interpretation conflict in Fortinet FortiGate 2.8, running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, allows remote attackers to bypass the URL blocker via an (1) HTTP request terminated with a line feed (LF) and not carriage return line feed (CRLF) or (2) HTTP request with no Host field, which is still processed by most web servers without violating RFC2616.",
    "id": "GSD-2005-3058"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2005-3058"
      ],
      "details": "Interpretation conflict in Fortinet FortiGate 2.8, running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, allows remote attackers to bypass the URL blocker via an (1) HTTP request terminated with a line feed (LF) and not carriage return line feed (CRLF) or (2) HTTP request with no Host field, which is still processed by most web servers without violating RFC2616.",
      "id": "GSD-2005-3058",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:12.528122Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2005-3058",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "Interpretation conflict in Fortinet FortiGate 2.8, running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, allows remote attackers to bypass the URL blocker via an (1) HTTP request terminated with a line feed (LF) and not carriage return line feed (CRLF) or (2) HTTP request with no Host field, which is still processed by most web servers without violating RFC2616."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "20060213 URL filter bypass in Fortinet",
            "refsource": "FULLDISC",
            "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-February/042140.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "20060213 URL filter bypass in Fortinet",
            "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424858/100/0/threaded"
          },
          {
            "name": "fortinet-web-filter-bypass(24626)",
            "refsource": "XF",
            "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24626"
          },
          {
            "name": "16599",
            "refsource": "BID",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16599"
          },
          {
            "name": "18844",
            "refsource": "SECUNIA",
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18844"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FGA-2006-10.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FGA-2006-10.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "ADV-2006-0539",
            "refsource": "VUPEN",
            "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0539"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "3_beta",
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "2.8_mr10",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          },
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:fortinet:fortigate:2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2005-3058"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Interpretation conflict in Fortinet FortiGate 2.8, running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, allows remote attackers to bypass the URL blocker via an (1) HTTP request terminated with a line feed (LF) and not carriage return line feed (CRLF) or (2) HTTP request with no Host field, which is still processed by most web servers without violating RFC2616."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-264"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "20060213 URL filter bypass in Fortinet",
              "refsource": "FULLDISC",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-February/042140.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "18844",
              "refsource": "SECUNIA",
              "tags": [
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18844"
            },
            {
              "name": "16599",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16599"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FGA-2006-10.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FGA-2006-10.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "ADV-2006-0539",
              "refsource": "VUPEN",
              "tags": [
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0539"
            },
            {
              "name": "fortinet-web-filter-bypass(24626)",
              "refsource": "XF",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24626"
            },
            {
              "name": "20060213 URL filter bypass in Fortinet",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424858/100/0/threaded"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
          "impactScore": 6.4,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": true,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "HIGH",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2018-10-19T15:34Z",
      "publishedDate": "2005-12-31T05:00Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.