gsd-2005-3382
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:20
Details
Multiple interpretation error in Sophos 3.91 with the 2.28.4 engine allows remote attackers to bypass virus scanning via a file such as BAT, HTML, and EML with an "MZ" magic byte sequence which is normally associated with EXE, which causes the file to be treated as a safe type that could still be executed as a dangerous file type by applications on the end system, as demonstrated by a "triple headed" program that contains EXE, EML, and HTML content, aka the "magic byte bug."
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2005-3382", "description": "Multiple interpretation error in Sophos 3.91 with the 2.28.4 engine allows remote attackers to bypass virus scanning via a file such as BAT, HTML, and EML with an \"MZ\" magic byte sequence which is normally associated with EXE, which causes the file to be treated as a safe type that could still be executed as a dangerous file type by applications on the end system, as demonstrated by a \"triple headed\" program that contains EXE, EML, and HTML content, aka the \"magic byte bug.\"", "id": "GSD-2005-3382" }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2005-3382" ], "details": "Multiple interpretation error in Sophos 3.91 with the 2.28.4 engine allows remote attackers to bypass virus scanning via a file such as BAT, HTML, and EML with an \"MZ\" magic byte sequence which is normally associated with EXE, which causes the file to be treated as a safe type that could still be executed as a dangerous file type by applications on the end system, as demonstrated by a \"triple headed\" program that contains EXE, EML, and HTML content, aka the \"magic byte bug.\"", "id": "GSD-2005-3382", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:13.045083Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2005-3382", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Multiple interpretation error in Sophos 3.91 with the 2.28.4 engine allows remote attackers to bypass virus scanning via a file such as BAT, HTML, and EML with an \"MZ\" magic byte sequence which is normally associated with EXE, which causes the file to be treated as a safe type that could still be executed as a dangerous file type by applications on the end system, as demonstrated by a \"triple headed\" program that contains EXE, EML, and HTML content, aka the \"magic byte bug.\"" } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "15189", "refsource": "BID", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15189" }, { "name": "http://www.securityelf.org/magicbyte.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.securityelf.org/magicbyte.html" }, { "name": "http://www.securityelf.org/magicbyteadv.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.securityelf.org/magicbyteadv.html" }, { "name": "20051025 Multiple Vendor Anti-Virus Software Detection Evasion Vulnerability through", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=113026417802703\u0026w=2" }, { "name": "http://www.securityelf.org/updmagic.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.securityelf.org/updmagic.html" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:sophos:sophos_anti-virus:3.91_engine_2.28.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2005-3382" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Multiple interpretation error in Sophos 3.91 with the 2.28.4 engine allows remote attackers to bypass virus scanning via a file such as BAT, HTML, and EML with an \"MZ\" magic byte sequence which is normally associated with EXE, which causes the file to be treated as a safe type that could still be executed as a dangerous file type by applications on the end system, as demonstrated by a \"triple headed\" program that contains EXE, EML, and HTML content, aka the \"magic byte bug.\"" } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "NVD-CWE-Other" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "http://www.securityelf.org/magicbyteadv.html", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.securityelf.org/magicbyteadv.html" }, { "name": "http://www.securityelf.org/magicbyte.html", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.securityelf.org/magicbyte.html" }, { "name": "http://www.securityelf.org/updmagic.html", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.securityelf.org/updmagic.html" }, { "name": "15189", "refsource": "BID", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15189" }, { "name": "20051025 Multiple Vendor Anti-Virus Software Detection Evasion Vulnerability through", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "tags": [], "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=113026417802703\u0026w=2" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 5.0, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "MEDIUM", "userInteractionRequired": false } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2016-10-18T03:35Z", "publishedDate": "2005-10-30T14:34Z" } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.