GSD-2006-2369
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:19Details
RealVNC 4.1.1, and other products that use RealVNC such as AdderLink IP and Cisco CallManager, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a request in which the client specifies an insecure security type such as "Type 1 - None", which is accepted even if it is not offered by the server, as originally demonstrated using a long password.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2006-2369",
"description": "RealVNC 4.1.1, and other products that use RealVNC such as AdderLink IP and Cisco CallManager, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a request in which the client specifies an insecure security type such as \"Type 1 - None\", which is accepted even if it is not offered by the server, as originally demonstrated using a long password.",
"id": "GSD-2006-2369",
"references": [
"https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/cve/CVE-2006-2369"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-2369"
],
"details": "RealVNC 4.1.1, and other products that use RealVNC such as AdderLink IP and Cisco CallManager, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a request in which the client specifies an insecure security type such as \"Type 1 - None\", which is accepted even if it is not offered by the server, as originally demonstrated using a long password.",
"id": "GSD-2006-2369",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:52.840819Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2006-2369",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "RealVNC 4.1.1, and other products that use RealVNC such as AdderLink IP and Cisco CallManager, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a request in which the client specifies an insecure security type such as \"Type 1 - None\", which is accepted even if it is not offered by the server, as originally demonstrated using a long password."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure\u0026m=114768344111131\u0026w=2",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure\u0026m=114768344111131\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "http://marc.info/?l=vnc-list\u0026m=114755444130188\u0026w=2",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=vnc-list\u0026m=114755444130188\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/29",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/29"
},
{
"name": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20107",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20107"
},
{
"name": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20109",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20109"
},
{
"name": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20789",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20789"
},
{
"name": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8355",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8355"
},
{
"name": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016083",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016083"
},
{
"name": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sr-20060622-cmm.shtml",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sr-20060622-cmm.shtml"
},
{
"name": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/security-flaw-in-realvnc-411.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/security-flaw-in-realvnc-411.html"
},
{
"name": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/vnc-flaw-proof-of-concept.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/vnc-flaw-proof-of-concept.html"
},
{
"name": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/117929",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/117929"
},
{
"name": "http://www.osvdb.org/25479",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/25479"
},
{
"name": "http://www.realvnc.com/products/free/4.1/release-notes.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.realvnc.com/products/free/4.1/release-notes.html"
},
{
"name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433994/100/0/threaded",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433994/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434015/100/0/threaded",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434015/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434117/100/0/threaded",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434117/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434518/100/0/threaded",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434518/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434560/100/0/threaded",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434560/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438175/100/0/threaded",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438175/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438368/100/0/threaded",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438368/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17978",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17978"
},
{
"name": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1790",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1790"
},
{
"name": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1821",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1821"
},
{
"name": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2492",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2492"
},
{
"name": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26445",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26445"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:vnc:realvnc:4.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2006-2369"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RealVNC 4.1.1, and other products that use RealVNC such as AdderLink IP and Cisco CallManager, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a request in which the client specifies an insecure security type such as \"Type 1 - None\", which is accepted even if it is not offered by the server, as originally demonstrated using a long password."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-287"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/security-flaw-in-realvnc-411.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/security-flaw-in-realvnc-411.html"
},
{
"name": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/vnc-flaw-proof-of-concept.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Patch"
],
"url": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/vnc-flaw-proof-of-concept.html"
},
{
"name": "http://www.realvnc.com/products/free/4.1/release-notes.html",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "http://www.realvnc.com/products/free/4.1/release-notes.html"
},
{
"name": "VU#117929",
"refsource": "CERT-VN",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory",
"US Government Resource"
],
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/117929"
},
{
"name": "17978",
"refsource": "BID",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Patch"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17978"
},
{
"name": "1016083",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Patch"
],
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016083"
},
{
"name": "20107",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20107"
},
{
"name": "20109",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20109"
},
{
"name": "25479",
"refsource": "OSVDB",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/25479"
},
{
"name": "20060622 RealVNC Remote Authentication Bypass Vulnerability",
"refsource": "CISCO",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sr-20060622-cmm.shtml"
},
{
"name": "20789",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20789"
},
{
"name": "ADV-2006-1790",
"refsource": "VUPEN",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1790"
},
{
"name": "ADV-2006-2492",
"refsource": "VUPEN",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2492"
},
{
"name": "ADV-2006-1821",
"refsource": "VUPEN",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1821"
},
{
"name": "8355",
"refsource": "SREASON",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8355"
},
{
"name": "[vnc-list] 20060513 Version 4.1.2",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=vnc-list\u0026m=114755444130188\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "20060515 RealVNC 4.1.1 Remote Compromise",
"refsource": "FULLDISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure\u0026m=114768344111131\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "realvnc-auth-bypass(26445)",
"refsource": "XF",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26445"
},
{
"name": "20060624 Re: Linux VNC evil client patch - BID 17978",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438368/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20060623 Linux VNC evil client patch - BID 17978",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438175/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20060520 Re: [Full-disclosure] RealVNC 4.1.1 Remote Compromise",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434560/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20060518 RE: [Full-disclosure] RealVNC 4.1.1 Remote Compromise",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434518/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20060516 re: RealVNC 4.1.1 Remote Compromise",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434117/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20060515 Re: [Full-disclosure] RealVNC 4.1.1 Remote Compromise",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434015/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20060515 RealVNC 4.1.1 Remote Compromise",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433994/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20220513 some details regarding CVE-2022-24422 / iDRAC VNC authentication",
"refsource": "FULLDISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/29"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": true,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "HIGH",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2022-05-13T18:15Z",
"publishedDate": "2006-05-15T16:06Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…