gsd-2006-4548
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:19
Details
e107 0.75 and earlier does not properly unset variables when the input data includes a numeric parameter with a value matching an alphanumeric parameter's hash value, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via the tinyMCE_imglib_include image/jpeg parameter in e107_handlers/tiny_mce/plugins/ibrowser/ibrowser.php, as demonstrated by a multipart/form-data request. NOTE: it could be argued that this vulnerability is due to a bug in the unset PHP command (CVE-2006-3017) and the proper fix should be in PHP; if so, then this should not be treated as a vulnerability in e107.
Aliases
Aliases
{ GSD: { alias: "CVE-2006-4548", description: "e107 0.75 and earlier does not properly unset variables when the input data includes a numeric parameter with a value matching an alphanumeric parameter's hash value, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via the tinyMCE_imglib_include image/jpeg parameter in e107_handlers/tiny_mce/plugins/ibrowser/ibrowser.php, as demonstrated by a multipart/form-data request. NOTE: it could be argued that this vulnerability is due to a bug in the unset PHP command (CVE-2006-3017) and the proper fix should be in PHP; if so, then this should not be treated as a vulnerability in e107.", id: "GSD-2006-4548", }, gsd: { metadata: { exploitCode: "unknown", remediation: "unknown", reportConfidence: "confirmed", type: "vulnerability", }, osvSchema: { aliases: [ "CVE-2006-4548", ], details: "e107 0.75 and earlier does not properly unset variables when the input data includes a numeric parameter with a value matching an alphanumeric parameter's hash value, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via the tinyMCE_imglib_include image/jpeg parameter in e107_handlers/tiny_mce/plugins/ibrowser/ibrowser.php, as demonstrated by a multipart/form-data request. NOTE: it could be argued that this vulnerability is due to a bug in the unset PHP command (CVE-2006-3017) and the proper fix should be in PHP; if so, then this should not be treated as a vulnerability in e107.", id: "GSD-2006-4548", modified: "2023-12-13T01:19:52.081157Z", schema_version: "1.4.0", }, }, namespaces: { "cve.org": { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org", ID: "CVE-2006-4548", STATE: "PUBLIC", }, affects: { vendor: { vendor_data: [ { product: { product_data: [ { product_name: "n/a", version: { version_data: [ { version_value: "n/a", }, ], }, }, ], }, vendor_name: "n/a", }, ], }, }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "e107 0.75 and earlier does not properly unset variables when the input data includes a numeric parameter with a value matching an alphanumeric parameter's hash value, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via the tinyMCE_imglib_include image/jpeg parameter in e107_handlers/tiny_mce/plugins/ibrowser/ibrowser.php, as demonstrated by a multipart/form-data request. NOTE: it could be argued that this vulnerability is due to a bug in the unset PHP command (CVE-2006-3017) and the proper fix should be in PHP; if so, then this should not be treated as a vulnerability in e107.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "eng", value: "n/a", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "http://retrogod.altervista.org/e107_075_xpl.html", refsource: "MISC", url: "http://retrogod.altervista.org/e107_075_xpl.html", }, { name: "20060829 e107 <= 0.75 GLOBALS[] overwrite/Zend_Hash_Del_Key_Or_Index remote commands execution", refsource: "BUGTRAQ", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/444644/100/0/threaded", }, { name: "1497", refsource: "SREASON", url: "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/1497", }, ], }, }, "nvd.nist.gov": { configurations: { CVE_data_version: "4.0", nodes: [ { children: [], cpe_match: [ { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:e107:e107:0.7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:e107:e107:0.7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:e107:e107:0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:e107:e107:0.7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:e107:e107:0.7.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:e107:e107:0.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, ], operator: "OR", }, ], }, cve: { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org", ID: "CVE-2006-4548", }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "en", value: "e107 0.75 and earlier does not properly unset variables when the input data includes a numeric parameter with a value matching an alphanumeric parameter's hash value, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via the tinyMCE_imglib_include image/jpeg parameter in e107_handlers/tiny_mce/plugins/ibrowser/ibrowser.php, as demonstrated by a multipart/form-data request. NOTE: it could be argued that this vulnerability is due to a bug in the unset PHP command (CVE-2006-3017) and the proper fix should be in PHP; if so, then this should not be treated as a vulnerability in e107.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "NVD-CWE-Other", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "http://retrogod.altervista.org/e107_075_xpl.html", refsource: "MISC", tags: [ "Exploit", ], url: "http://retrogod.altervista.org/e107_075_xpl.html", }, { name: "1497", refsource: "SREASON", tags: [], url: "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/1497", }, { name: "20060829 e107 <= 0.75 GLOBALS[] overwrite/Zend_Hash_Del_Key_Or_Index remote commands execution", refsource: "BUGTRAQ", tags: [], url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/444644/100/0/threaded", }, ], }, }, impact: { baseMetricV2: { cvssV2: { accessComplexity: "LOW", accessVector: "NETWORK", authentication: "NONE", availabilityImpact: "PARTIAL", baseScore: 7.5, confidentialityImpact: "PARTIAL", integrityImpact: "PARTIAL", vectorString: "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", version: "2.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 10, impactScore: 6.4, obtainAllPrivilege: false, obtainOtherPrivilege: true, obtainUserPrivilege: false, severity: "HIGH", userInteractionRequired: false, }, }, lastModifiedDate: "2018-10-17T21:37Z", publishedDate: "2006-09-06T00:04Z", }, }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.