GSD-2009-0125
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:19Details
** DISPUTED ** NOTE: this issue has been disputed by the upstream vendor. nasl/nasl_crypto2.c in the Nessus Attack Scripting Language library (aka libnasl) 2.2.11 does not properly check the return value from the OpenSSL DSA_do_verify function, which allows remote attackers to bypass validation of the certificate chain via a malformed SSL/TLS signature, a similar vulnerability to CVE-2008-5077. NOTE: the upstream vendor has disputed this issue, stating "while we do misuse this function (this is a bug), it has absolutely no security ramification."
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2009-0125",
"description": "** DISPUTED ** NOTE: this issue has been disputed by the upstream vendor. nasl/nasl_crypto2.c in the Nessus Attack Scripting Language library (aka libnasl) 2.2.11 does not properly check the return value from the OpenSSL DSA_do_verify function, which allows remote attackers to bypass validation of the certificate chain via a malformed SSL/TLS signature, a similar vulnerability to CVE-2008-5077. NOTE: the upstream vendor has disputed this issue, stating \"while we do misuse this function (this is a bug), it has absolutely no security ramification.\"",
"id": "GSD-2009-0125",
"references": [
"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-0125.html"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-0125"
],
"details": "** DISPUTED ** NOTE: this issue has been disputed by the upstream vendor. nasl/nasl_crypto2.c in the Nessus Attack Scripting Language library (aka libnasl) 2.2.11 does not properly check the return value from the OpenSSL DSA_do_verify function, which allows remote attackers to bypass validation of the certificate chain via a malformed SSL/TLS signature, a similar vulnerability to CVE-2008-5077. NOTE: the upstream vendor has disputed this issue, stating \"while we do misuse this function (this is a bug), it has absolutely no security ramification.\"",
"id": "GSD-2009-0125",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:44.864565Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2009-0125",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "** DISPUTED ** NOTE: this issue has been disputed by the upstream vendor. nasl/nasl_crypto2.c in the Nessus Attack Scripting Language library (aka libnasl) 2.2.11 does not properly check the return value from the OpenSSL DSA_do_verify function, which allows remote attackers to bypass validation of the certificate chain via a malformed SSL/TLS signature, a similar vulnerability to CVE-2008-5077. NOTE: the upstream vendor has disputed this issue, stating \"while we do misuse this function (this is a bug), it has absolutely no security ramification.\""
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "SUSE-SR:2009:003",
"refsource": "SUSE",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-02/msg00000.html"
},
{
"name": "20090120 CVE-2009-0125 (fwd)",
"refsource": "VIM",
"url": "http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2009-January/002133.html"
},
{
"name": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511517",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511517"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20090112 CVE Request -- tsqllib, slurm-llnl, libnasl, libcrypt-openssl-dsa-perl, erlang, boinc-client, m2crypto",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/01/12/4"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479655",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479655"
},
{
"name": "http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libnasl/F-10/libnasl.spec?r1=1.16\u0026r2=1.17",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libnasl/F-10/libnasl.spec?r1=1.16\u0026r2=1.17"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:finkproject:libnasl:2.2.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E21F62BE-A2DD-4FAB-9745-8BB7B6AF255D",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NOTE: this issue has been disputed by the upstream vendor. nasl/nasl_crypto2.c in the Nessus Attack Scripting Language library (aka libnasl) 2.2.11 does not properly check the return value from the OpenSSL DSA_do_verify function, which allows remote attackers to bypass validation of the certificate chain via a malformed SSL/TLS signature, a similar vulnerability to CVE-2008-5077. NOTE: the upstream vendor has disputed this issue, stating \"while we do misuse this function (this is a bug), it has absolutely no security ramification."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "** DISPUTADA ** NOTA: este problema ha sido disputado por el proveedor de origen. nasl/nasl_crypto2.c en la librer\u00eda Nessus Attack Scripting Language (tambi\u00e9n conocida como libnasl) 2.2.11 no comprueba correctamente el valor de retorno de la funci\u00f3n DSA_do_verify function de OpenSSL, lo que permite a atacantes remotos evadir la validaci\u00f3n de una cadena de certificados a trav\u00e9s de una firma SSL/TLS malformada, una vulnerabilidad similar a CVE-2008-5077. NOTA: el proveedor de origen ha disputado este problema, diciendo que \u0027aunque hacemos un uso indebido de esta funci\u00f3n (se trata de un bug), no tiene ninguna ramificaci\u00f3n de seguridad.\u0027"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2009-0125",
"lastModified": "2024-04-11T00:45:05.370",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2009-01-15T17:30:00.547",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511517"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libnasl/F-10/libnasl.spec?r1=1.16\u0026r2=1.17"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-02/msg00000.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/01/12/4"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2009-January/002133.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479655"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-287"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…