GSD-2010-4354
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21Details
The remote-access IPSec VPN implementation on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5500 series devices, PIX Security Appliances 500 series devices, and VPN Concentrators 3000 series devices responds to an Aggressive Mode IKE Phase I message only when the group name is configured on the device, which allows remote attackers to enumerate valid group names via a series of IKE negotiation attempts, aka Bug ID CSCtj96108, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2025.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2010-4354",
"description": "The remote-access IPSec VPN implementation on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5500 series devices, PIX Security Appliances 500 series devices, and VPN Concentrators 3000 series devices responds to an Aggressive Mode IKE Phase I message only when the group name is configured on the device, which allows remote attackers to enumerate valid group names via a series of IKE negotiation attempts, aka Bug ID CSCtj96108, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2025.",
"id": "GSD-2010-4354"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-4354"
],
"details": "The remote-access IPSec VPN implementation on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5500 series devices, PIX Security Appliances 500 series devices, and VPN Concentrators 3000 series devices responds to an Aggressive Mode IKE Phase I message only when the group name is configured on the device, which allows remote attackers to enumerate valid group names via a series of IKE negotiation attempts, aka Bug ID CSCtj96108, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2025.",
"id": "GSD-2010-4354",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:30.477806Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2010-4354",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The remote-access IPSec VPN implementation on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5500 series devices, PIX Security Appliances 500 series devices, and VPN Concentrators 3000 series devices responds to an Aggressive Mode IKE Phase I message only when the group name is configured on the device, which allows remote attackers to enumerate valid group names via a series of IKE negotiation attempts, aka Bug ID CSCtj96108, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2025."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "20101129 Cisco IPSec VPN Implementation Group Name Enumeration Vulnerability",
"refsource": "CISCO",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080b5992c.html"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa_5500:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:cisco:pix_500:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:cisco:vpn_3005_concentrator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:cisco:vpn_3080_concentrator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:cisco:vpn_3000_concentrator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:cisco:vpn_3020_concentrator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:cisco:vpn_3060_concentrator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:cisco:vpn_3015_concentrator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:cisco:vpn_3030_concentator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2010-4354"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The remote-access IPSec VPN implementation on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5500 series devices, PIX Security Appliances 500 series devices, and VPN Concentrators 3000 series devices responds to an Aggressive Mode IKE Phase I message only when the group name is configured on the device, which allows remote attackers to enumerate valid group names via a series of IKE negotiation attempts, aka Bug ID CSCtj96108, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2025."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-200"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "20101129 Cisco IPSec VPN Implementation Group Name Enumeration Vulnerability",
"refsource": "CISCO",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080b5992c.html"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2010-12-01T05:00Z",
"publishedDate": "2010-11-30T22:14Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…