gsd-2012-3526
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:20
Details
The reverse proxy add forward module (mod_rpaf) 0.5 and 0.6 for the Apache HTTP Server allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (server or application crash) via multiple X-Forwarded-For headers in a request.
Aliases
Aliases
{ GSD: { alias: "CVE-2012-3526", description: "The reverse proxy add forward module (mod_rpaf) 0.5 and 0.6 for the Apache HTTP Server allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (server or application crash) via multiple X-Forwarded-For headers in a request.", id: "GSD-2012-3526", }, gsd: { metadata: { exploitCode: "unknown", remediation: "unknown", reportConfidence: "confirmed", type: "vulnerability", }, osvSchema: { aliases: [ "CVE-2012-3526", ], details: "The reverse proxy add forward module (mod_rpaf) 0.5 and 0.6 for the Apache HTTP Server allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (server or application crash) via multiple X-Forwarded-For headers in a request.", id: "GSD-2012-3526", modified: "2023-12-13T01:20:20.725630Z", schema_version: "1.4.0", }, }, namespaces: { "cve.org": { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "secalert@redhat.com", ID: "CVE-2012-3526", STATE: "PUBLIC", }, affects: { vendor: { vendor_data: [ { product: { product_data: [ { product_name: "n/a", version: { version_data: [ { version_value: "n/a", }, ], }, }, ], }, vendor_name: "n/a", }, ], }, }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "The reverse proxy add forward module (mod_rpaf) 0.5 and 0.6 for the Apache HTTP Server allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (server or application crash) via multiple X-Forwarded-For headers in a request.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "eng", value: "n/a", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "[oss-security] 20120822 CVE Request: Apache mod RPAF denial of service", refsource: "MLIST", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/08/22/2", }, { name: "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683984", refsource: "MISC", url: "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683984", }, { name: "http://zecrazytux.net/troubleshooting/apache2-segfault-debugging-tutorial", refsource: "MISC", url: "http://zecrazytux.net/troubleshooting/apache2-segfault-debugging-tutorial", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20120822 Re: CVE Request: Apache mod RPAF denial of service", refsource: "MLIST", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/08/22/7", }, { name: "55154", refsource: "BID", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55154", }, { name: "modrpaf-apache-dos(77987)", refsource: "XF", url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/77987", }, { name: "50400", refsource: "SECUNIA", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/50400", }, { name: "DSA-2532", refsource: "DEBIAN", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2532", }, ], }, }, "nvd.nist.gov": { configurations: { CVE_data_version: "4.0", nodes: [ { children: [ { children: [], cpe_match: [ { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:thomas_eibner:mod_rpaf:0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:thomas_eibner:mod_rpaf:0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, ], operator: "OR", }, { children: [], cpe_match: [ { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:apache:http_server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: false, }, ], operator: "OR", }, ], cpe_match: [], operator: "AND", }, ], }, cve: { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "secalert@redhat.com", ID: "CVE-2012-3526", }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "en", value: "The reverse proxy add forward module (mod_rpaf) 0.5 and 0.6 for the Apache HTTP Server allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (server or application crash) via multiple X-Forwarded-For headers in a request.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "NVD-CWE-noinfo", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "[oss-security] 20120822 CVE Request: Apache mod RPAF denial of service", refsource: "MLIST", tags: [], url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/08/22/2", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20120822 Re: CVE Request: Apache mod RPAF denial of service", refsource: "MLIST", tags: [], url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/08/22/7", }, { name: "50400", refsource: "SECUNIA", tags: [ "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/50400", }, { name: "http://zecrazytux.net/troubleshooting/apache2-segfault-debugging-tutorial", refsource: "MISC", tags: [], url: "http://zecrazytux.net/troubleshooting/apache2-segfault-debugging-tutorial", }, { name: "DSA-2532", refsource: "DEBIAN", tags: [], url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2532", }, { name: "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683984", refsource: "MISC", tags: [], url: "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683984", }, { name: "55154", refsource: "BID", tags: [], url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55154", }, { name: "modrpaf-apache-dos(77987)", refsource: "XF", tags: [], url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/77987", }, ], }, }, impact: { baseMetricV2: { cvssV2: { accessComplexity: "LOW", accessVector: "NETWORK", authentication: "NONE", availabilityImpact: "PARTIAL", baseScore: 5, confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "NONE", vectorString: "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P", version: "2.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 10, impactScore: 2.9, obtainAllPrivilege: false, obtainOtherPrivilege: false, obtainUserPrivilege: false, severity: "MEDIUM", userInteractionRequired: false, }, }, lastModifiedDate: "2017-08-29T01:31Z", publishedDate: "2012-09-05T23:55Z", }, }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.