GSD-2012-4566
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:20Details
The DTLS support in radsecproxy before 1.6.2 does not properly verify certificates when there are configuration blocks with CA settings that are unrelated to the block being used for verifying the certificate chain, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and spoof clients, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-4523.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2012-4566",
"description": "The DTLS support in radsecproxy before 1.6.2 does not properly verify certificates when there are configuration blocks with CA settings that are unrelated to the block being used for verifying the certificate chain, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and spoof clients, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-4523.",
"id": "GSD-2012-4566",
"references": [
"https://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2573"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-4566"
],
"details": "The DTLS support in radsecproxy before 1.6.2 does not properly verify certificates when there are configuration blocks with CA settings that are unrelated to the block being used for verifying the certificate chain, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and spoof clients, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-4523.",
"id": "GSD-2012-4566",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:14.730649Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2012-4566",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The DTLS support in radsecproxy before 1.6.2 does not properly verify certificates when there are configuration blocks with CA settings that are unrelated to the block being used for verifying the certificate chain, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and spoof clients, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-4523."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "[radsecproxy] 20121025 Radsecproxy 1.6.1 is out",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "https://postlister.uninett.no/sympa/arc/radsecproxy/2012-10/msg00001.html"
},
{
"name": "51251",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51251"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20121031 Re: Re: CVE request: radsecproxy incorrect x.509 certificate validation",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/31/6"
},
{
"name": "DSA-2573",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2573"
},
{
"name": "[radsecproxy] 20120913 Radsecproxy is mixing up pre- and post-TLS-handshake client verification",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "https://postlister.uninett.no/sympa/arc/radsecproxy/2012-09/msg00001.html"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20121017 CVE request: radsecproxy incorrect x.509 certificate validation",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/17/7"
},
{
"name": "http://git.nordu.net/?p=radsecproxy.git;a=commit;h=3682c935facf5ccd7fa600644bbb76957155c680",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "http://git.nordu.net/?p=radsecproxy.git;a=commit;h=3682c935facf5ccd7fa600644bbb76957155c680"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndIncluding": "1.6.1",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.1:beta:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.0:p1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.0:alpha-p1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.3:beta:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.3:alpha:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.1:alpha:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy:1.0:alpha:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2012-4566"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The DTLS support in radsecproxy before 1.6.2 does not properly verify certificates when there are configuration blocks with CA settings that are unrelated to the block being used for verifying the certificate chain, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and spoof clients, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-4523."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-264"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://git.nordu.net/?p=radsecproxy.git;a=commit;h=3682c935facf5ccd7fa600644bbb76957155c680",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://git.nordu.net/?p=radsecproxy.git;a=commit;h=3682c935facf5ccd7fa600644bbb76957155c680"
},
{
"name": "51251",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51251"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20121031 Re: Re: CVE request: radsecproxy incorrect x.509 certificate validation",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/31/6"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20121017 CVE request: radsecproxy incorrect x.509 certificate validation",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/17/7"
},
{
"name": "[radsecproxy] 20121025 Radsecproxy 1.6.1 is out",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://postlister.uninett.no/sympa/arc/radsecproxy/2012-10/msg00001.html"
},
{
"name": "[radsecproxy] 20120913 Radsecproxy is mixing up pre- and post-TLS-handshake client verification",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://postlister.uninett.no/sympa/arc/radsecproxy/2012-09/msg00001.html"
},
{
"name": "DSA-2573",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2573"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.4,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 4.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2012-11-20T05:00Z",
"publishedDate": "2012-11-20T00:55Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…