GSD-2012-6088
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:20Details
The rpmpkgRead function in lib/package.c in RPM 4.10.x before 4.10.2 does not return an error code in certain situations involving an "unparseable signature," which allows remote attackers to bypass RPM signature checks via a crafted package.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2012-6088",
"description": "The rpmpkgRead function in lib/package.c in RPM 4.10.x before 4.10.2 does not return an error code in certain situations involving an \"unparseable signature,\" which allows remote attackers to bypass RPM signature checks via a crafted package.",
"id": "GSD-2012-6088",
"references": [
"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-6088.html"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-6088"
],
"details": "The rpmpkgRead function in lib/package.c in RPM 4.10.x before 4.10.2 does not return an error code in certain situations involving an \"unparseable signature,\" which allows remote attackers to bypass RPM signature checks via a crafted package.",
"id": "GSD-2012-6088",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:17.158444Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2012-6088",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The rpmpkgRead function in lib/package.c in RPM 4.10.x before 4.10.2 does not return an error code in certain situations involving an \"unparseable signature,\" which allows remote attackers to bypass RPM signature checks via a crafted package."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3d74c43",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3d74c43"
},
{
"name": "http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.2",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.2"
},
{
"name": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51706",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51706"
},
{
"name": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/01/03/9",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/01/03/9"
},
{
"name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57138",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57138"
},
{
"name": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1694-1",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1694-1"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796375",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796375"
},
{
"name": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/80953",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/80953"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:rpm:rpm:4.10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:rpm:rpm:4.10.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2012-6088"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The rpmpkgRead function in lib/package.c in RPM 4.10.x before 4.10.2 does not return an error code in certain situations involving an \"unparseable signature,\" which allows remote attackers to bypass RPM signature checks via a crafted package."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-255"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.2",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.2"
},
{
"name": "51706",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51706"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796375",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796375"
},
{
"name": "57138",
"refsource": "BID",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57138"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20130103 Re: CVE Request -- rpm (X \u003e= 4.10 and X \u003c 3d74c43 commit): Signature checking function returned success on (possibly malicious ) rpm packages",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/01/03/9"
},
{
"name": "USN-1694-1",
"refsource": "UBUNTU",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1694-1"
},
{
"name": "rpm-security-bypass(80953)",
"refsource": "XF",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/80953"
},
{
"name": "http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3d74c43",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3d74c43"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2023-02-13T04:37Z",
"publishedDate": "2013-01-18T11:48Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…