gsd-2013-0418
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:22
Details
Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Outside In Technology component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 8.3.7 and 8.4 allows context-dependent attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Outside In Filters, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0393. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the January 2013 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from an independent researcher that this is a heap-based buffer overflow in the Paradox database stream filter (vspdx.dll) that can be triggered using a table header with a crafted "number of fields" value.
Aliases
Aliases



{
   GSD: {
      alias: "CVE-2013-0418",
      description: "Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Outside In Technology component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 8.3.7 and 8.4 allows context-dependent attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Outside In Filters, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0393.  NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the January 2013 CPU.  Oracle has not commented on claims from an independent researcher that this is a heap-based buffer overflow in the Paradox database stream filter (vspdx.dll) that can be triggered using a table header with a crafted \"number of fields\" value.",
      id: "GSD-2013-0418",
   },
   gsd: {
      metadata: {
         exploitCode: "unknown",
         remediation: "unknown",
         reportConfidence: "confirmed",
         type: "vulnerability",
      },
      osvSchema: {
         aliases: [
            "CVE-2013-0418",
         ],
         details: "Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Outside In Technology component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 8.3.7 and 8.4 allows context-dependent attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Outside In Filters, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0393.  NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the January 2013 CPU.  Oracle has not commented on claims from an independent researcher that this is a heap-based buffer overflow in the Paradox database stream filter (vspdx.dll) that can be triggered using a table header with a crafted \"number of fields\" value.",
         id: "GSD-2013-0418",
         modified: "2023-12-13T01:22:14.375230Z",
         schema_version: "1.4.0",
      },
   },
   namespaces: {
      "cve.org": {
         CVE_data_meta: {
            ASSIGNER: "secalert_us@oracle.com",
            ID: "CVE-2013-0418",
            STATE: "PUBLIC",
         },
         affects: {
            vendor: {
               vendor_data: [
                  {
                     product: {
                        product_data: [
                           {
                              product_name: "n/a",
                              version: {
                                 version_data: [
                                    {
                                       version_value: "n/a",
                                    },
                                 ],
                              },
                           },
                        ],
                     },
                     vendor_name: "n/a",
                  },
               ],
            },
         },
         data_format: "MITRE",
         data_type: "CVE",
         data_version: "4.0",
         description: {
            description_data: [
               {
                  lang: "eng",
                  value: "Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Outside In Technology component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 8.3.7 and 8.4 allows context-dependent attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Outside In Filters, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0393.  NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the January 2013 CPU.  Oracle has not commented on claims from an independent researcher that this is a heap-based buffer overflow in the Paradox database stream filter (vspdx.dll) that can be triggered using a table header with a crafted \"number of fields\" value.",
               },
            ],
         },
         problemtype: {
            problemtype_data: [
               {
                  description: [
                     {
                        lang: "eng",
                        value: "n/a",
                     },
                  ],
               },
            ],
         },
         references: {
            reference_data: [
               {
                  name: "MS13-012",
                  refsource: "MS",
                  url: "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2013/ms13-012",
               },
               {
                  name: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2013-1515902.html",
                  refsource: "CONFIRM",
                  url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2013-1515902.html",
               },
               {
                  name: "oval:org.mitre.oval:def:16251",
                  refsource: "OVAL",
                  url: "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A16251",
               },
               {
                  name: "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21660640",
                  refsource: "CONFIRM",
                  url: "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21660640",
               },
               {
                  name: "20130117 Secunia Research: Oracle Outside In Technology Paradox Database Handling Buffer Overflow",
                  refsource: "BUGTRAQ",
                  url: "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-01/0073.html",
               },
               {
                  name: "TA13-043B",
                  refsource: "CERT",
                  url: "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA13-043B.html",
               },
               {
                  name: "MDVSA-2013:150",
                  refsource: "MANDRIVA",
                  url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:150",
               },
            ],
         },
      },
      "nvd.nist.gov": {
         configurations: {
            CVE_data_version: "4.0",
            nodes: [
               {
                  children: [],
                  cpe_match: [
                     {
                        cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:exchange_server:2010:sp2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                        cpe_name: [],
                        vulnerable: true,
                     },
                     {
                        cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:exchange_server:2007:sp3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                        cpe_name: [],
                        vulnerable: true,
                     },
                  ],
                  operator: "OR",
               },
               {
                  children: [],
                  cpe_match: [
                     {
                        cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:fusion_middleware:8.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                        cpe_name: [],
                        vulnerable: true,
                     },
                     {
                        cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:fusion_middleware:8.3.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                        cpe_name: [],
                        vulnerable: true,
                     },
                  ],
                  operator: "OR",
               },
            ],
         },
         cve: {
            CVE_data_meta: {
               ASSIGNER: "secalert_us@oracle.com",
               ID: "CVE-2013-0418",
            },
            data_format: "MITRE",
            data_type: "CVE",
            data_version: "4.0",
            description: {
               description_data: [
                  {
                     lang: "en",
                     value: "Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Outside In Technology component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 8.3.7 and 8.4 allows context-dependent attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Outside In Filters, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0393.  NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the January 2013 CPU.  Oracle has not commented on claims from an independent researcher that this is a heap-based buffer overflow in the Paradox database stream filter (vspdx.dll) that can be triggered using a table header with a crafted \"number of fields\" value.",
                  },
               ],
            },
            problemtype: {
               problemtype_data: [
                  {
                     description: [
                        {
                           lang: "en",
                           value: "NVD-CWE-noinfo",
                        },
                     ],
                  },
               ],
            },
            references: {
               reference_data: [
                  {
                     name: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2013-1515902.html",
                     refsource: "CONFIRM",
                     tags: [
                        "Vendor Advisory",
                     ],
                     url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2013-1515902.html",
                  },
                  {
                     name: "20130117 Secunia Research: Oracle Outside In Technology Paradox Database Handling Buffer Overflow",
                     refsource: "BUGTRAQ",
                     tags: [],
                     url: "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-01/0073.html",
                  },
                  {
                     name: "TA13-043B",
                     refsource: "CERT",
                     tags: [
                        "US Government Resource",
                     ],
                     url: "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA13-043B.html",
                  },
                  {
                     name: "MDVSA-2013:150",
                     refsource: "MANDRIVA",
                     tags: [],
                     url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:150",
                  },
                  {
                     name: "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21660640",
                     refsource: "CONFIRM",
                     tags: [],
                     url: "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21660640",
                  },
                  {
                     name: "oval:org.mitre.oval:def:16251",
                     refsource: "OVAL",
                     tags: [],
                     url: "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A16251",
                  },
                  {
                     name: "MS13-012",
                     refsource: "MS",
                     tags: [],
                     url: "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2013/ms13-012",
                  },
               ],
            },
         },
         impact: {
            baseMetricV2: {
               cvssV2: {
                  accessComplexity: "MEDIUM",
                  accessVector: "NETWORK",
                  authentication: "NONE",
                  availabilityImpact: "PARTIAL",
                  baseScore: 6.8,
                  confidentialityImpact: "PARTIAL",
                  integrityImpact: "PARTIAL",
                  vectorString: "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
                  version: "2.0",
               },
               exploitabilityScore: 8.6,
               impactScore: 6.4,
               obtainAllPrivilege: false,
               obtainOtherPrivilege: false,
               obtainUserPrivilege: false,
               severity: "MEDIUM",
               userInteractionRequired: false,
            },
         },
         lastModifiedDate: "2018-10-12T22:03Z",
         publishedDate: "2013-01-17T01:55Z",
      },
   },
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.