gsd-2013-1624
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:22
Details
The TLS implementation in the Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.48 and C# library before 1.8 does not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC check operation during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, a related issue to CVE-2013-0169.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2013-1624",
"description": "The TLS implementation in the Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.48 and C# library before 1.8 does not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC check operation during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, a related issue to CVE-2013-0169.",
"id": "GSD-2013-1624",
"references": [
"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2013-1624.html",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1009",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:0896",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:0401",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:0400",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:0372",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:0371"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-1624"
],
"details": "The TLS implementation in the Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.48 and C# library before 1.8 does not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC check operation during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, a related issue to CVE-2013-0169.",
"id": "GSD-2013-1624",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:22:20.558983Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2013-1624",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The TLS implementation in the Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.48 and C# library before 1.8 does not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC check operation during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, a related issue to CVE-2013-0169."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/tls/TLStiming.pdf",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/tls/TLStiming.pdf"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20130205 Re: CVE request: TLS CBC padding timing flaw in various SSL / TLS implementations",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/05/24"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2014:0371",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0371.html"
},
{
"name": "57719",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/57719"
},
{
"name": "57716",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/57716"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2014:0372",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0372.html"
}
]
}
},
"gitlab.com": {
"advisories": [
{
"affected_range": "(,1.48)",
"affected_versions": "All versions before 1.48",
"cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1035",
"CWE-310",
"CWE-937"
],
"date": "2022-07-08",
"description": "The TLS implementation in the Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.48 and C# library before 1.8 does not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC check operation during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, a related issue to CVE-2013-0169.",
"fixed_versions": [
"1.48"
],
"identifier": "CVE-2013-1624",
"identifiers": [
"GHSA-8353-fgcr-xfhx",
"CVE-2013-1624"
],
"not_impacted": "All versions starting from 1.48",
"package_slug": "maven/org.bouncycastle/bcprov-jdk15on",
"pubdate": "2022-05-14",
"solution": "Upgrade to version 1.48 or above.",
"title": "Improper Input Validation in Bouncy Castle",
"urls": [
"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-1624",
"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/05/24",
"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0371.html",
"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0372.html",
"http://secunia.com/advisories/57716",
"http://secunia.com/advisories/57719",
"http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/tls/TLStiming.pdf",
"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8353-fgcr-xfhx"
],
"uuid": "58c409c0-11b2-4d56-926c-e4cbcc94dac3"
}
]
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.20:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.17:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.04:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.03:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.08:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.07:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.06:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.23:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.24:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.32:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.31:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.43:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.44:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.02:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.01:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.05:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.19:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.27:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.21:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.22:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.37:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.38:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.45:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.46:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.30:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.28:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.34:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.33:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.39:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.40:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.47:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.09:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.18:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.25:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.26:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.36:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.35:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.29:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.41:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:1.42:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-c\\#-cryptography-api:1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-c\\#-cryptography-api:1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-c\\#-cryptography-api:1.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-c\\#-cryptography-api:1.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-c\\#-cryptography-api:1.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-c\\#-cryptography-api:1.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-c\\#-cryptography-api:1.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-c\\#-cryptography-api:0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-c\\#-cryptography-api:1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2013-1624"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The TLS implementation in the Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.48 and C# library before 1.8 does not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC check operation during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, a related issue to CVE-2013-0169."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-310"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20130205 Re: CVE request: TLS CBC padding timing flaw in various SSL / TLS implementations",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/05/24"
},
{
"name": "http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/tls/TLStiming.pdf",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/tls/TLStiming.pdf"
},
{
"name": "57716",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/57716"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2014:0371",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0371.html"
},
{
"name": "57719",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/57719"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2014:0372",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0372.html"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "HIGH",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 4.9,
"impactScore": 4.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2018-10-30T16:26Z",
"publishedDate": "2013-02-08T19:55Z"
}
}
}
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.