GSD-2013-7259

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:22
Details
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Neo4J 1.9.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated by a request to (1) db/data/ext/GremlinPlugin/graphdb/execute_script or (2) db/manage/server/console/.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2013-7259
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2013-7259",
    "description": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Neo4J 1.9.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated by a request to (1) db/data/ext/GremlinPlugin/graphdb/execute_script or (2) db/manage/server/console/.",
    "id": "GSD-2013-7259"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2013-7259"
      ],
      "details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Neo4J 1.9.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated by a request to (1) db/data/ext/GremlinPlugin/graphdb/execute_script or (2) db/manage/server/console/.",
      "id": "GSD-2013-7259",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:22:18.481973Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2013-7259",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Neo4J 1.9.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated by a request to (1) db/data/ext/GremlinPlugin/graphdb/execute_script or (2) db/manage/server/console/."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/o2platform/DefCon_RESTing/tree/master/Live-Demos/Neo4j",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/o2platform/DefCon_RESTing/tree/master/Live-Demos/Neo4j"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://blog.diniscruz.com/2013/08/neo4j-csrf-payload-to-start-processes.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://blog.diniscruz.com/2013/08/neo4j-csrf-payload-to-start-processes.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20140103 Re: Neo4J CSRF: Potential CVE candidate",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/01/03/8"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20140103 Neo4J CSRF: Potential CVE candidate",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/01/03/3"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:neo4j:neo4j:1.9.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2013-7259"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Neo4J 1.9.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated by a request to (1) db/data/ext/GremlinPlugin/graphdb/execute_script or (2) db/manage/server/console/."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-352"
                },
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-78"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20140103 Re: Neo4J CSRF: Potential CVE candidate",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/01/03/8"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/o2platform/DefCon_RESTing/tree/master/Live-Demos/Neo4j",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://github.com/o2platform/DefCon_RESTing/tree/master/Live-Demos/Neo4j"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20140103 Neo4J CSRF: Potential CVE candidate",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/01/03/3"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://blog.diniscruz.com/2013/08/neo4j-csrf-payload-to-start-processes.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://blog.diniscruz.com/2013/08/neo4j-csrf-payload-to-start-processes.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "baseScore": 6.8,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
          "impactScore": 6.4,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": true
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2014-08-04T21:42Z",
      "publishedDate": "2014-04-29T14:38Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.