GSD-2014-9754
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:22Details
The hardware VPN client in Viprinet MultichannelVPN Router 300 version 2013070830/2013080900 does not validate the remote VPN endpoint identity (through the checking of the endpoint's SSL key) before initiating the exchange, which allows an attacker to perform a Man in the Middle attack.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2014-9754",
"description": "The hardware VPN client in Viprinet MultichannelVPN Router 300 version 2013070830/2013080900 does not validate the remote VPN endpoint identity (through the checking of the endpoint\u0027s SSL key) before initiating the exchange, which allows an attacker to perform a Man in the Middle attack.",
"id": "GSD-2014-9754"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-9754"
],
"details": "The hardware VPN client in Viprinet MultichannelVPN Router 300 version 2013070830/2013080900 does not validate the remote VPN endpoint identity (through the checking of the endpoint\u0027s SSL key) before initiating the exchange, which allows an attacker to perform a Man in the Middle attack.",
"id": "GSD-2014-9754",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:22:47.836510Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2014-9754",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The hardware VPN client in Viprinet MultichannelVPN Router 300 version 2013070830/2013080900 does not validate the remote VPN endpoint identity (through the checking of the endpoint\u0027s SSL key) before initiating the exchange, which allows an attacker to perform a Man in the Middle attack."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "20160203 Security Advisories",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/537441/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/135614/Viprinet-Multichannel-VPN-Router-300-Identity-Verification-Fail.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/135614/Viprinet-Multichannel-VPN-Router-300-Identity-Verification-Fail.html"
},
{
"name": "20160203 Security Advisories",
"refsource": "FULLDISC",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Feb/8"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:viprinet:multichannel_vpn_router_300_firmware:2013080900:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:viprinet:multichannel_vpn_router_300_firmware:2013070830:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:viprinet:multichannel_vpn_router_300:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"cpe_match": [],
"operator": "AND"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2014-9754"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The hardware VPN client in Viprinet MultichannelVPN Router 300 version 2013070830/2013080900 does not validate the remote VPN endpoint identity (through the checking of the endpoint\u0027s SSL key) before initiating the exchange, which allows an attacker to perform a Man in the Middle attack."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-20"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "20160203 Security Advisories",
"refsource": "FULLDISC",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Feb/8"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/135614/Viprinet-Multichannel-VPN-Router-300-Identity-Verification-Fail.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/135614/Viprinet-Multichannel-VPN-Router-300-Identity-Verification-Fail.html"
},
{
"name": "20160203 Security Advisories",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/537441/100/0/threaded"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 3.6
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2018-10-09T19:55Z",
"publishedDate": "2017-01-20T15:59Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…