GSD-2015-2674
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:20Details
Restkit allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging use of the ssl.wrap_socket function in Python with the default CERT_NONE value for the cert_reqs argument.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2015-2674",
"description": "Restkit allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging use of the ssl.wrap_socket function in Python with the default CERT_NONE value for the cert_reqs argument.",
"id": "GSD-2015-2674",
"references": [
"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-2674.html"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-2674"
],
"details": "Restkit allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging use of the ssl.wrap_socket function in Python with the default CERT_NONE value for the cert_reqs argument.",
"id": "GSD-2015-2674",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:00.392018Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2015-2674",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Restkit allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging use of the ssl.wrap_socket function in Python with the default CERT_NONE value for the cert_reqs argument."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20150323 Re: Assign a CVE for Python\u0027s restkit Please",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/03/23/7"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/benoitc/restkit/issues/140",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/benoitc/restkit/issues/140"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202837",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202837"
}
]
}
},
"gitlab.com": {
"advisories": [
{
"affected_range": "\u003e0.0.0a",
"affected_versions": "All versions",
"credit": "Donald Stufft - Rackspace",
"cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1035",
"CWE-295",
"CWE-937"
],
"date": "2017-08-21",
"description": "RESTKit for Python contains a flaw as X.509 certificates are not properly validated. By spoofing the TLS/SSL server via a certificate that appears valid, an attacker with the ability to intercept network traffic (e.g. MiTM, DNS cache poisoning) can disclose and optionally manipulate transmitted data.",
"fixed_versions": [],
"identifier": "CVE-2015-2674",
"identifiers": [
"CVE-2015-2674"
],
"package_slug": "pypi/restkit",
"pubdate": "2017-08-09",
"solution": "There is no solution for this vulnerability at the moment.",
"title": "Missing X.509 certificate validation",
"urls": [
"http://osvdb.org/show/osvdb/119503",
"https://github.com/benoitc/restkit/issues/140"
],
"uuid": "2ed2fc50-f5a1-499d-ac7c-b2d327774dd4"
}
]
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:restkit:restkit:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2015-2674"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Restkit allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging use of the ssl.wrap_socket function in Python with the default CERT_NONE value for the cert_reqs argument."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-295"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/benoitc/restkit/issues/140",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/benoitc/restkit/issues/140"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202837",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202837"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20150323 Re: Assign a CVE for Python\u0027s restkit Please",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/03/23/7"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 3.6
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2017-08-21T15:00Z",
"publishedDate": "2017-08-09T18:29Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…