GSD-2015-3908

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:20
Details
Ansible before 1.9.2 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2015-3908
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2015-3908",
    "description": "Ansible before 1.9.2 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.",
    "id": "GSD-2015-3908",
    "references": [
      "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3908.html",
      "https://advisories.mageia.org/CVE-2015-3908.html"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2015-3908"
      ],
      "details": "Ansible before 1.9.2 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.",
      "id": "GSD-2015-3908",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:07.395033Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2015-3908",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "Ansible before 1.9.2 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20150714 [CVE-2015-3908] Improper TLS Certificate Validation in Ansible",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/07/14/4"
          },
          {
            "name": "openSUSE-SU-2015:1280",
            "refsource": "SUSE",
            "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-07/msg00051.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://www.ansible.com/security",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "http://www.ansible.com/security"
          },
          {
            "name": "openSUSE-SU-2015:1452",
            "refsource": "SUSE",
            "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-08/msg00029.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20190916 [SECURITY] [DLA 1923-1] ansible security update",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/09/msg00016.html"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "gitlab.com": {
      "advisories": [
        {
          "affected_range": "\u003c1.9.2",
          "affected_versions": "All versions before 1.9.2",
          "cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
          "cwe_ids": [
            "CWE-1035",
            "CWE-345",
            "CWE-937"
          ],
          "date": "2019-09-16",
          "description": "Ansible fails to adequately validate HTTPS certificates when using the get_url and uri modules, and when using the url and etcd lookup plugins. This allows for man-in-the-middle attacks on those connections.",
          "fixed_versions": [
            "1.9.2"
          ],
          "identifier": "CVE-2015-3908",
          "identifiers": [
            "CVE-2015-3908"
          ],
          "not_impacted": "All versions starting from 1.9.2",
          "package_slug": "pypi/ansible",
          "pubdate": "2015-08-12",
          "solution": "Upgrade to version 1.9.2 or above.",
          "title": "Improper TLS Certificate Validation",
          "urls": [
            "http://www.ansible.com/security",
            "https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/devel/CHANGELOG.md#192-dancing-in-the-street---jun-26-2015"
          ],
          "uuid": "55c63cd5-8228-487d-a148-fb16ef0a4b56"
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:ansible:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "1.9.1",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2015-3908"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Ansible before 1.9.2 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-345"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "openSUSE-SU-2015:1280",
              "refsource": "SUSE",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-07/msg00051.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20150714 [CVE-2015-3908] Improper TLS Certificate Validation in Ansible",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/07/14/4"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.ansible.com/security",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.ansible.com/security"
            },
            {
              "name": "openSUSE-SU-2015:1452",
              "refsource": "SUSE",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-08/msg00029.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20190916 [SECURITY] [DLA 1923-1] ansible security update",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/09/msg00016.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.3,
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2019-09-16T15:15Z",
      "publishedDate": "2015-08-12T14:59Z"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.