gsd-2015-5314
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:20
Details
The eap_pwd_process function in eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c in hostapd 2.x before 2.6 does not validate that the reassembly buffer is large enough for the final fragment when used with (1) an internal EAP server or (2) a RADIUS server and EAP-pwd is enabled in a runtime configuration, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process termination) via a large final fragment in an EAP-pwd message.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2015-5314", "description": "The eap_pwd_process function in eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c in hostapd 2.x before 2.6 does not validate that the reassembly buffer is large enough for the final fragment when used with (1) an internal EAP server or (2) a RADIUS server and EAP-pwd is enabled in a runtime configuration, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process termination) via a large final fragment in an EAP-pwd message.", "id": "GSD-2015-5314", "references": [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5314.html", "https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3397", "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2015-5314" ] }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-5314" ], "details": "The eap_pwd_process function in eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c in hostapd 2.x before 2.6 does not validate that the reassembly buffer is large enough for the final fragment when used with (1) an internal EAP server or (2) a RADIUS server and EAP-pwd is enabled in a runtime configuration, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process termination) via a large final fragment in an EAP-pwd message.", "id": "GSD-2015-5314", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:05.915398Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2015-5314", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "The eap_pwd_process function in eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c in hostapd 2.x before 2.6 does not validate that the reassembly buffer is large enough for the final fragment when used with (1) an internal EAP server or (2) a RADIUS server and EAP-pwd is enabled in a runtime configuration, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process termination) via a large final fragment in an EAP-pwd message." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "USN-2808-1", "refsource": "UBUNTU", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2808-1" }, { "name": "DSA-3397", "refsource": "DEBIAN", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3397" }, { "name": "http://w1.fi/security/2015-7/eap-pwd-missing-last-fragment-length-validation.txt", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "http://w1.fi/security/2015-7/eap-pwd-missing-last-fragment-length-validation.txt" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20151110 hostapd/wpa_supplicant: EAP-pwd missing last fragment length validation", "refsource": "MLIST", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/10/10" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:w1.fi:wpa_supplicant:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndExcluding": "2.6", "versionStartIncluding": "2.0", "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" }, { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2015-5314" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "The eap_pwd_process function in eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c in hostapd 2.x before 2.6 does not validate that the reassembly buffer is large enough for the final fragment when used with (1) an internal EAP server or (2) a RADIUS server and EAP-pwd is enabled in a runtime configuration, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process termination) via a large final fragment in an EAP-pwd message." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-119" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "USN-2808-1", "refsource": "UBUNTU", "tags": [ "Broken Link" ], "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2808-1" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20151110 hostapd/wpa_supplicant: EAP-pwd missing last fragment length validation", "refsource": "MLIST", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Mitigation", "Patch", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/10/10" }, { "name": "http://w1.fi/security/2015-7/eap-pwd-missing-last-fragment-length-validation.txt", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Mitigation", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://w1.fi/security/2015-7/eap-pwd-missing-last-fragment-length-validation.txt" }, { "name": "DSA-3397", "refsource": "DEBIAN", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3397" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 4.3, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "MEDIUM", "userInteractionRequired": false }, "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 5.9, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 2.2, "impactScore": 3.6 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2018-03-21T13:07Z", "publishedDate": "2018-02-21T16:29Z" } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.