gsd-2015-6254
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:20
Details
The (1) Service Provider (SP) and (2) Identity Provider (IdP) in PicketLink before 2.7.0 does not ensure that the Destination attribute in a Response element in a SAML assertion matches the location from which the message was received, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2015-0277 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2015-6254", "description": "The (1) Service Provider (SP) and (2) Identity Provider (IdP) in PicketLink before 2.7.0 does not ensure that the Destination attribute in a Response element in a SAML assertion matches the location from which the message was received, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2015-0277 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types.", "id": "GSD-2015-6254", "references": [ "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:0849", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:0848", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:0847", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:0846" ] }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-6254" ], "details": "The (1) Service Provider (SP) and (2) Identity Provider (IdP) in PicketLink before 2.7.0 does not ensure that the Destination attribute in a Response element in a SAML assertion matches the location from which the message was received, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2015-0277 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types.", "id": "GSD-2015-6254", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:04.427304Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2015-6254", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "The (1) Service Provider (SP) and (2) Identity Provider (IdP) in PicketLink before 2.7.0 does not ensure that the Destination attribute in a Response element in a SAML assertion matches the location from which the message was received, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2015-0277 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-680", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-680" }, { "name": "RHSA-2015:0849", "refsource": "REDHAT", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0849.html" }, { "name": "RHSA-2015:0848", "refsource": "REDHAT", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0848.html" }, { "name": "RHSA-2015:0846", "refsource": "REDHAT", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0846.html" }, { "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194832", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194832" }, { "name": "RHSA-2015:0847", "refsource": "REDHAT", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0847.html" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:picketlink:picketlink:*:cr5:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndIncluding": "2.6.0", "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2015-6254" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "The (1) Service Provider (SP) and (2) Identity Provider (IdP) in PicketLink before 2.7.0 does not ensure that the Destination attribute in a Response element in a SAML assertion matches the location from which the message was received, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2015-0277 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-17" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "RHSA-2015:0848", "refsource": "REDHAT", "tags": [], "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0848.html" }, { "name": "RHSA-2015:0847", "refsource": "REDHAT", "tags": [], "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0847.html" }, { "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194832", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194832" }, { "name": "RHSA-2015:0849", "refsource": "REDHAT", "tags": [], "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0849.html" }, { "name": "RHSA-2015:0846", "refsource": "REDHAT", "tags": [], "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0846.html" }, { "name": "https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-680", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [], "url": "https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-680" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "SINGLE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 6.0, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 6.8, "impactScore": 6.4, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "MEDIUM", "userInteractionRequired": false } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2015-08-19T22:54Z", "publishedDate": "2015-08-17T20:59Z" } } }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.