gsd-2015-8994
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:20
Details
An issue was discovered in PHP 5.x and 7.x, when the configuration uses apache2handler/mod_php or php-fpm with OpCache enabled. With 5.x after 5.6.28 or 7.x after 7.0.13, the issue is resolved in a non-default configuration with the opcache.validate_permission=1 setting. The vulnerability details are as follows. In PHP SAPIs where PHP interpreters share a common parent process, Zend OpCache creates a shared memory object owned by the common parent during initialization. Child PHP processes inherit the SHM descriptor, using it to cache and retrieve compiled script bytecode ("opcode" in PHP jargon). Cache keys vary depending on configuration, but filename is a central key component, and compiled opcode can generally be run if a script's filename is known or can be guessed. Many common shared-hosting configurations change EUID in child processes to enforce privilege separation among hosted users (for example using mod_ruid2 for the Apache HTTP Server, or php-fpm user settings). In these scenarios, the default Zend OpCache behavior defeats script file permissions by sharing a single SHM cache among all child PHP processes. PHP scripts often contain sensitive information: Think of CMS configurations where reading or running another user's script usually means gaining privileges to the CMS database.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2015-8994", "description": "An issue was discovered in PHP 5.x and 7.x, when the configuration uses apache2handler/mod_php or php-fpm with OpCache enabled. With 5.x after 5.6.28 or 7.x after 7.0.13, the issue is resolved in a non-default configuration with the opcache.validate_permission=1 setting. The vulnerability details are as follows. In PHP SAPIs where PHP interpreters share a common parent process, Zend OpCache creates a shared memory object owned by the common parent during initialization. Child PHP processes inherit the SHM descriptor, using it to cache and retrieve compiled script bytecode (\"opcode\" in PHP jargon). Cache keys vary depending on configuration, but filename is a central key component, and compiled opcode can generally be run if a script\u0027s filename is known or can be guessed. Many common shared-hosting configurations change EUID in child processes to enforce privilege separation among hosted users (for example using mod_ruid2 for the Apache HTTP Server, or php-fpm user settings). In these scenarios, the default Zend OpCache behavior defeats script file permissions by sharing a single SHM cache among all child PHP processes. PHP scripts often contain sensitive information: Think of CMS configurations where reading or running another user\u0027s script usually means gaining privileges to the CMS database.", "id": "GSD-2015-8994", "references": [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8994.html", "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2015-8994" ] }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-8994" ], "details": "An issue was discovered in PHP 5.x and 7.x, when the configuration uses apache2handler/mod_php or php-fpm with OpCache enabled. With 5.x after 5.6.28 or 7.x after 7.0.13, the issue is resolved in a non-default configuration with the opcache.validate_permission=1 setting. The vulnerability details are as follows. In PHP SAPIs where PHP interpreters share a common parent process, Zend OpCache creates a shared memory object owned by the common parent during initialization. Child PHP processes inherit the SHM descriptor, using it to cache and retrieve compiled script bytecode (\"opcode\" in PHP jargon). Cache keys vary depending on configuration, but filename is a central key component, and compiled opcode can generally be run if a script\u0027s filename is known or can be guessed. Many common shared-hosting configurations change EUID in child processes to enforce privilege separation among hosted users (for example using mod_ruid2 for the Apache HTTP Server, or php-fpm user settings). In these scenarios, the default Zend OpCache behavior defeats script file permissions by sharing a single SHM cache among all child PHP processes. PHP scripts often contain sensitive information: Think of CMS configurations where reading or running another user\u0027s script usually means gaining privileges to the CMS database.", "id": "GSD-2015-8994", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:03.413539Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2015-8994", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "An issue was discovered in PHP 5.x and 7.x, when the configuration uses apache2handler/mod_php or php-fpm with OpCache enabled. With 5.x after 5.6.28 or 7.x after 7.0.13, the issue is resolved in a non-default configuration with the opcache.validate_permission=1 setting. The vulnerability details are as follows. In PHP SAPIs where PHP interpreters share a common parent process, Zend OpCache creates a shared memory object owned by the common parent during initialization. Child PHP processes inherit the SHM descriptor, using it to cache and retrieve compiled script bytecode (\"opcode\" in PHP jargon). Cache keys vary depending on configuration, but filename is a central key component, and compiled opcode can generally be run if a script\u0027s filename is known or can be guessed. Many common shared-hosting configurations change EUID in child processes to enforce privilege separation among hosted users (for example using mod_ruid2 for the Apache HTTP Server, or php-fpm user settings). In these scenarios, the default Zend OpCache behavior defeats script file permissions by sharing a single SHM cache among all child PHP processes. PHP scripts often contain sensitive information: Think of CMS configurations where reading or running another user\u0027s script usually means gaining privileges to the CMS database." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/28/1", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/28/1" }, { "name": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q1/520", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q1/520" }, { "name": "http://marc.info/?l=php-internals\u0026m=147921016724565\u0026w=2", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=php-internals\u0026m=147921016724565\u0026w=2" }, { "name": "https://ma.ttias.be/a-better-way-to-run-php-fpm/", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://ma.ttias.be/a-better-way-to-run-php-fpm/" }, { "name": "http://marc.info/?l=php-internals\u0026m=147876797317925\u0026w=2", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=php-internals\u0026m=147876797317925\u0026w=2" }, { "name": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/343", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/343" }, { "name": "https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=69090", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=69090" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:php:php:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndIncluding": "5.6.29", "versionStartIncluding": "5.0.0", "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:php:php:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndExcluding": "7.0.14", "versionStartIncluding": "7.0.0", "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2015-8994" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An issue was discovered in PHP 5.x and 7.x, when the configuration uses apache2handler/mod_php or php-fpm with OpCache enabled. With 5.x after 5.6.28 or 7.x after 7.0.13, the issue is resolved in a non-default configuration with the opcache.validate_permission=1 setting. The vulnerability details are as follows. In PHP SAPIs where PHP interpreters share a common parent process, Zend OpCache creates a shared memory object owned by the common parent during initialization. Child PHP processes inherit the SHM descriptor, using it to cache and retrieve compiled script bytecode (\"opcode\" in PHP jargon). Cache keys vary depending on configuration, but filename is a central key component, and compiled opcode can generally be run if a script\u0027s filename is known or can be guessed. Many common shared-hosting configurations change EUID in child processes to enforce privilege separation among hosted users (for example using mod_ruid2 for the Apache HTTP Server, or php-fpm user settings). In these scenarios, the default Zend OpCache behavior defeats script file permissions by sharing a single SHM cache among all child PHP processes. PHP scripts often contain sensitive information: Think of CMS configurations where reading or running another user\u0027s script usually means gaining privileges to the CMS database." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-264" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://ma.ttias.be/a-better-way-to-run-php-fpm/", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Technical Description", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://ma.ttias.be/a-better-way-to-run-php-fpm/" }, { "name": "https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=69090", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Issue Tracking" ], "url": "https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=69090" }, { "name": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q1/520", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q1/520" }, { "name": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/343", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/343" }, { "name": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/28/1", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Mailing List" ], "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/28/1" }, { "name": "http://marc.info/?l=php-internals\u0026m=147921016724565\u0026w=2", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Mailing List" ], "url": "http://marc.info/?l=php-internals\u0026m=147921016724565\u0026w=2" }, { "name": "http://marc.info/?l=php-internals\u0026m=147876797317925\u0026w=2", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Mailing List" ], "url": "http://marc.info/?l=php-internals\u0026m=147876797317925\u0026w=2" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 6.8, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "impactScore": 6.4, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "MEDIUM", "userInteractionRequired": false }, "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.6, "impactScore": 5.9 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2022-08-16T13:16Z", "publishedDate": "2017-03-02T06:59Z" } } }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.