gsd-2016-0270
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:21
Details
IBM Domino 9.0.1 Fix Pack 3 Interim Fix 2 through 9.0.1 Fix Pack 5 Interim Fix 1, when using TLS and AES GCM, uses random nonce generation, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain the authentication key and spoof data by leveraging the reuse of a nonce in a session and a "forbidden attack." NOTE: this CVE has been incorrectly used for GCM nonce reuse issues in other products; see CVE-2016-10213 for the A10 issue, CVE-2016-10212 for the Radware issue, and CVE-2017-5933 for the Citrix issue.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2016-0270", "description": "IBM Domino 9.0.1 Fix Pack 3 Interim Fix 2 through 9.0.1 Fix Pack 5 Interim Fix 1, when using TLS and AES GCM, uses random nonce generation, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain the authentication key and spoof data by leveraging the reuse of a nonce in a session and a \"forbidden attack.\" NOTE: this CVE has been incorrectly used for GCM nonce reuse issues in other products; see CVE-2016-10213 for the A10 issue, CVE-2016-10212 for the Radware issue, and CVE-2017-5933 for the Citrix issue.", "id": "GSD-2016-0270" }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-0270" ], "details": "IBM Domino 9.0.1 Fix Pack 3 Interim Fix 2 through 9.0.1 Fix Pack 5 Interim Fix 1, when using TLS and AES GCM, uses random nonce generation, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain the authentication key and spoof data by leveraging the reuse of a nonce in a session and a \"forbidden attack.\" NOTE: this CVE has been incorrectly used for GCM nonce reuse issues in other products; see CVE-2016-10213 for the A10 issue, CVE-2016-10212 for the Radware issue, and CVE-2017-5933 for the Citrix issue.", "id": "GSD-2016-0270", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:17.251680Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "psirt@us.ibm.com", "ID": "CVE-2016-0270", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "IBM Domino 9.0.1 Fix Pack 3 Interim Fix 2 through 9.0.1 Fix Pack 5 Interim Fix 1, when using TLS and AES GCM, uses random nonce generation, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain the authentication key and spoof data by leveraging the reuse of a nonce in a session and a \"forbidden attack.\" NOTE: this CVE has been incorrectly used for GCM nonce reuse issues in other products; see CVE-2016-10213 for the A10 issue, CVE-2016-10212 for the Radware issue, and CVE-2017-5933 for the Citrix issue." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "96062", "refsource": "BID", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96062" }, { "name": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979604", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979604" }, { "name": "https://github.com/nonce-disrespect/nonce-disrespect", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://github.com/nonce-disrespect/nonce-disrespect" }, { "name": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979673", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979673" }, { "name": "https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX220329", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX220329" }, { "name": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979669", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979669" }, { "name": "1037795", "refsource": "SECTRACK", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037795" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:domino:9.0.1.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:client_application_access:1.0.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:notes:9.0.1.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:notes:9.0.1.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:notes:9.0.1.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:domino:9.0.1.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:domino:9.0.1.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "psirt@us.ibm.com", "ID": "CVE-2016-0270" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "IBM Domino 9.0.1 Fix Pack 3 Interim Fix 2 through 9.0.1 Fix Pack 5 Interim Fix 1, when using TLS and AES GCM, uses random nonce generation, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain the authentication key and spoof data by leveraging the reuse of a nonce in a session and a \"forbidden attack.\" NOTE: this CVE has been incorrectly used for GCM nonce reuse issues in other products; see CVE-2016-10213 for the A10 issue, CVE-2016-10212 for the Radware issue, and CVE-2017-5933 for the Citrix issue." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-200" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://github.com/nonce-disrespect/nonce-disrespect", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://github.com/nonce-disrespect/nonce-disrespect" }, { "name": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979673", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Mitigation", "Patch", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979673" }, { "name": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979669", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Mitigation", "Patch", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979669" }, { "name": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979604", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Mitigation", "Patch", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979604" }, { "name": "96062", "refsource": "BID", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96062" }, { "name": "1037795", "refsource": "SECTRACK", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037795" }, { "name": "https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX220329", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [], "url": "https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX220329" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 4.3, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "MEDIUM", "userInteractionRequired": false }, "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 5.9, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "version": "3.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 2.2, "impactScore": 3.6 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2017-11-15T02:29Z", "publishedDate": "2017-02-08T16:59Z" } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.