gsd-2016-10092
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:21
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the readContigStripsIntoBuffer function in tif_unix.c in LibTIFF 4.0.7, 3.9.3, 3.9.4, 3.9.5, 3.9.6, 3.9.7, 4.0.0alpha4, 4.0.0alpha5, 4.0.0alpha6, 4.0.0beta7, 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.0.4, 4.0.4beta, 4.0.5 and 4.0.6 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted image.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2016-10092", "description": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the readContigStripsIntoBuffer function in tif_unix.c in LibTIFF 4.0.7, 3.9.3, 3.9.4, 3.9.5, 3.9.6, 3.9.7, 4.0.0alpha4, 4.0.0alpha5, 4.0.0alpha6, 4.0.0beta7, 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.0.4, 4.0.4beta, 4.0.5 and 4.0.6 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted image.", "id": "GSD-2016-10092", "references": [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-10092.html", "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3762", "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2016-10092", "https://advisories.mageia.org/CVE-2016-10092.html" ] }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-10092" ], "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the readContigStripsIntoBuffer function in tif_unix.c in LibTIFF 4.0.7, 3.9.3, 3.9.4, 3.9.5, 3.9.6, 3.9.7, 4.0.0alpha4, 4.0.0alpha5, 4.0.0alpha6, 4.0.0beta7, 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.0.4, 4.0.4beta, 4.0.5 and 4.0.6 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted image.", "id": "GSD-2016-10092", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:26.340084Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2016-10092", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the readContigStripsIntoBuffer function in tif_unix.c in LibTIFF 4.0.7, 3.9.3, 3.9.4, 3.9.5, 3.9.6, 3.9.7, 4.0.0alpha4, 4.0.0alpha5, 4.0.0alpha6, 4.0.0beta7, 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.0.4, 4.0.4beta, 4.0.5 and 4.0.6 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted image." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2017/01/01/libtiff-multiple-heap-based-buffer-overflow/", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2017/01/01/libtiff-multiple-heap-based-buffer-overflow/" }, { "name": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2620", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2620" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20170101 Re: Re: libtiff: multiple heap-based buffer overflow", "refsource": "MLIST", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/01/12" }, { "name": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2622", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2622" }, { "name": "95218", "refsource": "BID", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95218" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20170101 Re: libtiff: multiple heap-based buffer overflow", "refsource": "MLIST", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/01/10" }, { "name": "DSA-3762", "refsource": "DEBIAN", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3762" }, { "name": "https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/9657bbe3cdce4aaa90e07d50c1c70ae52da0ba6a", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/9657bbe3cdce4aaa90e07d50c1c70ae52da0ba6a" }, { "name": "https://github.com/Hack-Me/Pocs_for_Multi_Versions/tree/main/CVE-2016-10092", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://github.com/Hack-Me/Pocs_for_Multi_Versions/tree/main/CVE-2016-10092" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:4.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2016-10092" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the readContigStripsIntoBuffer function in tif_unix.c in LibTIFF 4.0.7, 3.9.3, 3.9.4, 3.9.5, 3.9.6, 3.9.7, 4.0.0alpha4, 4.0.0alpha5, 4.0.0alpha6, 4.0.0beta7, 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.0.4, 4.0.4beta, 4.0.5 and 4.0.6 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted image." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-119" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/9657bbe3cdce4aaa90e07d50c1c70ae52da0ba6a", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/9657bbe3cdce4aaa90e07d50c1c70ae52da0ba6a" }, { "name": "https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2017/01/01/libtiff-multiple-heap-based-buffer-overflow/", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2017/01/01/libtiff-multiple-heap-based-buffer-overflow/" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20170101 Re: Re: libtiff: multiple heap-based buffer overflow", "refsource": "MLIST", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/01/12" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20170101 Re: libtiff: multiple heap-based buffer overflow", "refsource": "MLIST", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/01/10" }, { "name": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2622", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Issue Tracking" ], "url": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2622" }, { "name": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2620", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Issue Tracking" ], "url": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2620" }, { "name": "95218", "refsource": "BID", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95218" }, { "name": "DSA-3762", "refsource": "DEBIAN", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3762" }, { "name": "https://github.com/Hack-Me/Pocs_for_Multi_Versions/tree/main/CVE-2016-10092", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [], "url": "https://github.com/Hack-Me/Pocs_for_Multi_Versions/tree/main/CVE-2016-10092" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 6.8, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "impactScore": 6.4, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "MEDIUM", "userInteractionRequired": true }, "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.8, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8, "impactScore": 5.9 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2021-03-05T17:15Z", "publishedDate": "2017-03-01T15:59Z" } } }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.