GSD-2016-10255

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21
Details
The __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock function in elf_getdata.c in elfutils before 0.168 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted (1) sh_off or (2) sh_size ELF header value, which triggers a memory allocation failure.
Aliases
Aliases

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2016-10255",
    "description": "The __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock function in elf_getdata.c in elfutils before 0.168 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted (1) sh_off or (2) sh_size ELF header value, which triggers a memory allocation failure.",
    "id": "GSD-2016-10255",
    "references": [
      "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-10255.html",
      "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2016-10255",
      "https://advisories.mageia.org/CVE-2016-10255.html"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2016-10255"
      ],
      "details": "The __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock function in elf_getdata.c in elfutils before 0.168 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted (1) sh_off or (2) sh_size ELF header value, which triggers a memory allocation failure.",
      "id": "GSD-2016-10255",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:26.262935Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2016-10255",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "The __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock function in elf_getdata.c in elfutils before 0.168 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted (1) sh_off or (2) sh_size ELF header value, which triggers a memory allocation failure."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "USN-3670-1",
            "refsource": "UBUNTU",
            "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3670-1/"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387584",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387584"
          },
          {
            "name": "GLSA-201710-10",
            "refsource": "GENTOO",
            "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-10"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20170322 Re: elfutils: memory allocation failure in __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock (elf_getdata.c)",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/03/22/1"
          },
          {
            "name": "[elfutils-devel] 20161021 [PATCH] libelf: Sanity check offset and size before trying to malloc and read data.",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/elfutils-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org/thread/Q4LE47FPEVRZANMV6JE2NMHYO4H5MHGJ/"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2016/11/04/elfutils-memory-allocation-failure-in-__libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock-elf_getdata-c/",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2016/11/04/elfutils-memory-allocation-failure-in-__libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock-elf_getdata-c/"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:elfutils_project:elfutils:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "0.167",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2016-10255"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "The __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock function in elf_getdata.c in elfutils before 0.168 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted (1) sh_off or (2) sh_size ELF header value, which triggers a memory allocation failure."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-119"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "[elfutils-devel] 20161021 [PATCH] libelf: Sanity check offset and size before trying to malloc and read data.",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/elfutils-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org/thread/Q4LE47FPEVRZANMV6JE2NMHYO4H5MHGJ/"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387584",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Issue Tracking",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387584"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2016/11/04/elfutils-memory-allocation-failure-in-__libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock-elf_getdata-c/",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2016/11/04/elfutils-memory-allocation-failure-in-__libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock-elf_getdata-c/"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20170322 Re: elfutils: memory allocation failure in __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock (elf_getdata.c)",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/03/22/1"
            },
            {
              "name": "GLSA-201710-10",
              "refsource": "GENTOO",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-10"
            },
            {
              "name": "USN-3670-1",
              "refsource": "UBUNTU",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3670-1/"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "baseScore": 4.3,
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": true
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 5.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
            "version": "3.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
          "impactScore": 3.6
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2018-06-07T01:29Z",
      "publishedDate": "2017-03-23T16:59Z"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…