GSD-2017-3203
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21Details
The Java implementations of AMF3 deserializers in Pivotal/Spring Spring-flex derive class instances from java.io.Externalizable rather than the AMF3 specification's recommendation of flash.utils.IExternalizable. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control an RMI server connection may be able to send serialized Java objects that execute arbitrary code when deserialized.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2017-3203",
"description": "The Java implementations of AMF3 deserializers in Pivotal/Spring Spring-flex derive class instances from java.io.Externalizable rather than the AMF3 specification\u0027s recommendation of flash.utils.IExternalizable. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control an RMI server connection may be able to send serialized Java objects that execute arbitrary code when deserialized.",
"id": "GSD-2017-3203"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-3203"
],
"details": "The Java implementations of AMF3 deserializers in Pivotal/Spring Spring-flex derive class instances from java.io.Externalizable rather than the AMF3 specification\u0027s recommendation of flash.utils.IExternalizable. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control an RMI server connection may be able to send serialized Java objects that execute arbitrary code when deserialized.",
"id": "GSD-2017-3203",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:16.269734Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cert@cert.org",
"ID": "CVE-2017-3203",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Pivotal/Spring Spring-flex\u0027s Action Message Format (AMF3) Java implementation is vulnerable to insecure deserialization"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Spring-flex",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"affected": "=",
"version_name": "0",
"version_value": "0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Pivotal/Spring"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The Java implementations of AMF3 deserializers in Pivotal/Spring Spring-flex derive class instances from java.io.Externalizable rather than the AMF3 specification\u0027s recommendation of flash.utils.IExternalizable. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control an RMI server connection may be able to send serialized Java objects that execute arbitrary code when deserialized."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://codewhitesec.blogspot.com/2017/04/amf.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://codewhitesec.blogspot.com/2017/04/amf.html"
},
{
"name": "VU#307983",
"refsource": "CERT-VN",
"url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/307983"
},
{
"name": "http://www.securityweek.com/flaws-java-amf-libraries-allow-remote-code-execution",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.securityweek.com/flaws-java-amf-libraries-allow-remote-code-execution"
},
{
"name": "97376",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97376"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
},
"gitlab.com": {
"advisories": [
{
"affected_range": "(,1.5.2.RELEASE]",
"affected_versions": "All versions up to 1.5.2.release",
"cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1035",
"CWE-502",
"CWE-78",
"CWE-937"
],
"date": "2022-07-01",
"description": "The Java implementations of AMF3 deserializers in Pivotal/Spring Spring-flex derive class instances from `java.io.Externalizable` rather than the AMF3 specification\u0027s recommendation of `flash.utils.IExternalizable`. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control an RMI server connection may be able to send serialized Java objects that execute arbitrary code when deserialized.",
"fixed_versions": [],
"identifier": "CVE-2017-3203",
"identifiers": [
"GHSA-8v4h-j42h-wfhc",
"CVE-2017-3203"
],
"not_impacted": "",
"package_slug": "maven/org.springframework.flex/spring-flex",
"pubdate": "2022-05-13",
"solution": "Unfortunately, there is no solution available yet.",
"title": "Deserialization of Untrusted Data",
"urls": [
"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-3203",
"https://codewhitesec.blogspot.com/2017/04/amf.html",
"https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/307983",
"http://www.securityweek.com/flaws-java-amf-libraries-allow-remote-code-execution",
"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8v4h-j42h-wfhc"
],
"uuid": "6196bf28-cd9d-47fb-8b8f-0409e2a602ae"
}
]
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:pivotal:spring-flex:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cert@cert.org",
"ID": "CVE-2017-3203"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Java implementations of AMF3 deserializers in Pivotal/Spring Spring-flex derive class instances from java.io.Externalizable rather than the AMF3 specification\u0027s recommendation of flash.utils.IExternalizable. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control an RMI server connection may be able to send serialized Java objects that execute arbitrary code when deserialized."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-502"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "97376",
"refsource": "BID",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97376"
},
{
"name": "VU#307983",
"refsource": "CERT-VN",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"US Government Resource"
],
"url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/307983"
},
{
"name": "https://codewhitesec.blogspot.com/2017/04/amf.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Mitigation",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://codewhitesec.blogspot.com/2017/04/amf.html"
},
{
"name": "http://www.securityweek.com/flaws-java-amf-libraries-allow-remote-code-execution",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.securityweek.com/flaws-java-amf-libraries-allow-remote-code-execution"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 5.9
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2019-10-09T23:27Z",
"publishedDate": "2018-06-11T17:29Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…