GSD-2019-11409

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:24
Details
app/operator_panel/exec.php in the Operator Panel module in FusionPBX 4.4.3 suffers from a command injection vulnerability due to a lack of input validation that allows authenticated non-administrative attackers to execute commands on the host. This can further lead to remote code execution when combined with an XSS vulnerability also present in the FusionPBX Operator Panel module.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2019-11409
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2019-11409",
    "description": "app/operator_panel/exec.php in the Operator Panel module in FusionPBX 4.4.3 suffers from a command injection vulnerability due to a lack of input validation that allows authenticated non-administrative attackers to execute commands on the host. This can further lead to remote code execution when combined with an XSS vulnerability also present in the FusionPBX Operator Panel module.",
    "id": "GSD-2019-11409",
    "references": [
      "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/cve/CVE-2019-11409"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2019-11409"
      ],
      "details": "app/operator_panel/exec.php in the Operator Panel module in FusionPBX 4.4.3 suffers from a command injection vulnerability due to a lack of input validation that allows authenticated non-administrative attackers to execute commands on the host. This can further lead to remote code execution when combined with an XSS vulnerability also present in the FusionPBX Operator Panel module.",
      "id": "GSD-2019-11409",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:24:02.013976Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2019-11409",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "app/operator_panel/exec.php in the Operator Panel module in FusionPBX 4.4.3 suffers from a command injection vulnerability due to a lack of input validation that allows authenticated non-administrative attackers to execute commands on the host. This can further lead to remote code execution when combined with an XSS vulnerability also present in the FusionPBX Operator Panel module."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/fusionpbx/fusionpbx/commit/e43ca27ba2d9c0109a6bf198fe2f8d79f63e0611",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/fusionpbx/fusionpbx/commit/e43ca27ba2d9c0109a6bf198fe2f8d79f63e0611"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153256/FusionPBX-4.4.3-Remote-Command-Execution.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153256/FusionPBX-4.4.3-Remote-Command-Execution.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://blog.gdssecurity.com/labs/2019/6/7/rce-using-caller-id-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-fusionpbx.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://blog.gdssecurity.com/labs/2019/6/7/rce-using-caller-id-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-fusionpbx.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155344/FusionPBX-Operator-Panel-exec.php-Command-Execution.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155344/FusionPBX-Operator-Panel-exec.php-Command-Execution.html"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:fusionpbx:fusionpbx:4.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2019-11409"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "app/operator_panel/exec.php in the Operator Panel module in FusionPBX 4.4.3 suffers from a command injection vulnerability due to a lack of input validation that allows authenticated non-administrative attackers to execute commands on the host. This can further lead to remote code execution when combined with an XSS vulnerability also present in the FusionPBX Operator Panel module."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-78"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/fusionpbx/fusionpbx/commit/e43ca27ba2d9c0109a6bf198fe2f8d79f63e0611",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/fusionpbx/fusionpbx/commit/e43ca27ba2d9c0109a6bf198fe2f8d79f63e0611"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://blog.gdssecurity.com/labs/2019/6/7/rce-using-caller-id-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-fusionpbx.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://blog.gdssecurity.com/labs/2019/6/7/rce-using-caller-id-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-fusionpbx.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153256/FusionPBX-4.4.3-Remote-Command-Execution.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit",
                "Third Party Advisory",
                "VDB Entry"
              ],
              "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153256/FusionPBX-4.4.3-Remote-Command-Execution.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155344/FusionPBX-Operator-Panel-exec.php-Command-Execution.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit",
                "Third Party Advisory",
                "VDB Entry"
              ],
              "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155344/FusionPBX-Operator-Panel-exec.php-Command-Execution.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "acInsufInfo": false,
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "SINGLE",
            "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
          "impactScore": 6.4,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 8.8,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
          "impactScore": 5.9
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2022-04-18T17:16Z",
      "publishedDate": "2019-06-17T19:15Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.