gsd-2019-18277
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:23
Details
A flaw was found in HAProxy before 2.0.6. In legacy mode, messages featuring a transfer-encoding header missing the "chunked" value were not being correctly rejected. The impact was limited but if combined with the "http-reuse always" setting, it could be used to help construct an HTTP request smuggling attack against a vulnerable component employing a lenient parser that would ignore the content-length header as soon as it saw a transfer-encoding one (even if not entirely valid according to the specification).
Aliases
Aliases
{ GSD: { alias: "CVE-2019-18277", description: "A flaw was found in HAProxy before 2.0.6. In legacy mode, messages featuring a transfer-encoding header missing the \"chunked\" value were not being correctly rejected. The impact was limited but if combined with the \"http-reuse always\" setting, it could be used to help construct an HTTP request smuggling attack against a vulnerable component employing a lenient parser that would ignore the content-length header as soon as it saw a transfer-encoding one (even if not entirely valid according to the specification).", id: "GSD-2019-18277", references: [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-18277.html", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:2265", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:1936", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:1725", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:1287", "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2019-18277", "https://linux.oracle.com/cve/CVE-2019-18277.html", ], }, gsd: { metadata: { exploitCode: "unknown", remediation: "unknown", reportConfidence: "confirmed", type: "vulnerability", }, osvSchema: { aliases: [ "CVE-2019-18277", ], details: "A flaw was found in HAProxy before 2.0.6. In legacy mode, messages featuring a transfer-encoding header missing the \"chunked\" value were not being correctly rejected. The impact was limited but if combined with the \"http-reuse always\" setting, it could be used to help construct an HTTP request smuggling attack against a vulnerable component employing a lenient parser that would ignore the content-length header as soon as it saw a transfer-encoding one (even if not entirely valid according to the specification).", id: "GSD-2019-18277", modified: "2023-12-13T01:23:50.096032Z", schema_version: "1.4.0", }, }, namespaces: { "cve.org": { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org", ID: "CVE-2019-18277", STATE: "PUBLIC", }, affects: { vendor: { vendor_data: [ { product: { product_data: [ { product_name: "n/a", version: { version_data: [ { version_value: "n/a", }, ], }, }, ], }, vendor_name: "n/a", }, ], }, }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "A flaw was found in HAProxy before 2.0.6. In legacy mode, messages featuring a transfer-encoding header missing the \"chunked\" value were not being correctly rejected. The impact was limited but if combined with the \"http-reuse always\" setting, it could be used to help construct an HTTP request smuggling attack against a vulnerable component employing a lenient parser that would ignore the content-length header as soon as it saw a transfer-encoding one (even if not entirely valid according to the specification).", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "eng", value: "n/a", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg34926.html", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg34926.html", }, { name: "https://nathandavison.com/blog/haproxy-http-request-smuggling", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://nathandavison.com/blog/haproxy-http-request-smuggling", }, { name: "https://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-2.0.git;a=commit;h=196a7df44d8129d1adc795da020b722614d6a581", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-2.0.git;a=commit;h=196a7df44d8129d1adc795da020b722614d6a581", }, { name: "USN-4174-1", refsource: "UBUNTU", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4174-1/", }, { name: "openSUSE-SU-2019:2626", refsource: "SUSE", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-12/msg00016.html", }, { name: "openSUSE-SU-2019:2645", refsource: "SUSE", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-12/msg00019.html", }, { name: "[debian-lts-announce] 20220530 [SECURITY] [DLA 3034-1] haproxy security update", refsource: "MLIST", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00045.html", }, ], }, }, "nvd.nist.gov": { configurations: { CVE_data_version: "4.0", nodes: [ { children: [], cpe_match: [ { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:haproxy:haproxy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], versionEndExcluding: "2.0.6", vulnerable: true, }, ], operator: "OR", }, ], }, cve: { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org", ID: "CVE-2019-18277", }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "en", value: "A flaw was found in HAProxy before 2.0.6. In legacy mode, messages featuring a transfer-encoding header missing the \"chunked\" value were not being correctly rejected. The impact was limited but if combined with the \"http-reuse always\" setting, it could be used to help construct an HTTP request smuggling attack against a vulnerable component employing a lenient parser that would ignore the content-length header as soon as it saw a transfer-encoding one (even if not entirely valid according to the specification).", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-444", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "https://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-2.0.git;a=commit;h=196a7df44d8129d1adc795da020b722614d6a581", refsource: "MISC", tags: [ "Patch", "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-2.0.git;a=commit;h=196a7df44d8129d1adc795da020b722614d6a581", }, { name: "https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg34926.html", refsource: "MISC", tags: [ "Release Notes", ], url: "https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg34926.html", }, { name: "https://nathandavison.com/blog/haproxy-http-request-smuggling", refsource: "MISC", tags: [ "Exploit", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://nathandavison.com/blog/haproxy-http-request-smuggling", }, { name: "USN-4174-1", refsource: "UBUNTU", tags: [], url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4174-1/", }, { name: "openSUSE-SU-2019:2626", refsource: "SUSE", tags: [], url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-12/msg00016.html", }, { name: "openSUSE-SU-2019:2645", refsource: "SUSE", tags: [], url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-12/msg00019.html", }, { name: "[debian-lts-announce] 20220530 [SECURITY] [DLA 3034-1] haproxy security update", refsource: "MLIST", tags: [], url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00045.html", }, ], }, }, impact: { baseMetricV2: { acInsufInfo: false, cvssV2: { accessComplexity: "MEDIUM", accessVector: "NETWORK", authentication: "NONE", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 4.3, confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "PARTIAL", vectorString: "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N", version: "2.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 8.6, impactScore: 2.9, obtainAllPrivilege: false, obtainOtherPrivilege: false, obtainUserPrivilege: false, severity: "MEDIUM", userInteractionRequired: false, }, baseMetricV3: { cvssV3: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 7.5, baseSeverity: "HIGH", confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 3.9, impactScore: 3.6, }, }, lastModifiedDate: "2022-06-02T14:15Z", publishedDate: "2019-10-23T14:15Z", }, }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.