gsd-2019-19579
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:23
Details
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.12.x allowing attackers to gain host OS privileges via DMA in a situation where an untrusted domain has access to a physical device (and assignable-add is not used), because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-18424. XSA-302 relies on the use of libxl's "assignable-add" feature to prepare devices to be assigned to untrusted guests. Unfortunately, this is not considered a strictly required step for device assignment. The PCI passthrough documentation on the wiki describes alternate ways of preparing devices for assignment, and libvirt uses its own ways as well. Hosts where these "alternate" methods are used will still leave the system in a vulnerable state after the device comes back from a guest. An untrusted domain with access to a physical device can DMA into host memory, leading to privilege escalation. Only systems where guests are given direct access to physical devices capable of DMA (PCI pass-through) are vulnerable. Systems which do not use PCI pass-through are not vulnerable.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2019-19579", "description": "An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.12.x allowing attackers to gain host OS privileges via DMA in a situation where an untrusted domain has access to a physical device (and assignable-add is not used), because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-18424. XSA-302 relies on the use of libxl\u0027s \"assignable-add\" feature to prepare devices to be assigned to untrusted guests. Unfortunately, this is not considered a strictly required step for device assignment. The PCI passthrough documentation on the wiki describes alternate ways of preparing devices for assignment, and libvirt uses its own ways as well. Hosts where these \"alternate\" methods are used will still leave the system in a vulnerable state after the device comes back from a guest. An untrusted domain with access to a physical device can DMA into host memory, leading to privilege escalation. Only systems where guests are given direct access to physical devices capable of DMA (PCI pass-through) are vulnerable. Systems which do not use PCI pass-through are not vulnerable.", "id": "GSD-2019-19579", "references": [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-19579.html", "https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4602" ] }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2019-19579" ], "details": "An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.12.x allowing attackers to gain host OS privileges via DMA in a situation where an untrusted domain has access to a physical device (and assignable-add is not used), because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-18424. XSA-302 relies on the use of libxl\u0027s \"assignable-add\" feature to prepare devices to be assigned to untrusted guests. Unfortunately, this is not considered a strictly required step for device assignment. The PCI passthrough documentation on the wiki describes alternate ways of preparing devices for assignment, and libvirt uses its own ways as well. Hosts where these \"alternate\" methods are used will still leave the system in a vulnerable state after the device comes back from a guest. An untrusted domain with access to a physical device can DMA into host memory, leading to privilege escalation. Only systems where guests are given direct access to physical devices capable of DMA (PCI pass-through) are vulnerable. Systems which do not use PCI pass-through are not vulnerable.", "id": "GSD-2019-19579", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:23:53.808841Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2019-19579", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.12.x allowing attackers to gain host OS privileges via DMA in a situation where an untrusted domain has access to a physical device (and assignable-add is not used), because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-18424. XSA-302 relies on the use of libxl\u0027s \"assignable-add\" feature to prepare devices to be assigned to untrusted guests. Unfortunately, this is not considered a strictly required step for device assignment. The PCI passthrough documentation on the wiki describes alternate ways of preparing devices for assignment, and libvirt uses its own ways as well. Hosts where these \"alternate\" methods are used will still leave the system in a vulnerable state after the device comes back from a guest. An untrusted domain with access to a physical device can DMA into host memory, leading to privilege escalation. Only systems where guests are given direct access to physical devices capable of DMA (PCI pass-through) are vulnerable. Systems which do not use PCI pass-through are not vulnerable." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-306.html", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-306.html" }, { "name": "https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-306.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-306.html" }, { "name": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/11/26/2", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/11/26/2" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20191205 Xen Security Advisory 306 v3 (CVE-2019-19579) - Device quarantine for alternate pci assignment methods", "refsource": "MLIST", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/05/7" }, { "name": "FEDORA-2019-3d7105bd2a", "refsource": "FEDORA", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RJYT5FNGM7JSVHHW6B22TSAATBOAPFPD/" }, { "name": "openSUSE-SU-2020:0011", "refsource": "SUSE", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00011.html" }, { "name": "DSA-4602", "refsource": "DEBIAN", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4602" }, { "name": "20200114 [SECURITY] [DSA 4602-1] xen security update", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "url": "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2020/Jan/21" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:xen:xen:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndIncluding": "4.12.1", "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" }, { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:30:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2019-19579" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.12.x allowing attackers to gain host OS privileges via DMA in a situation where an untrusted domain has access to a physical device (and assignable-add is not used), because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-18424. XSA-302 relies on the use of libxl\u0027s \"assignable-add\" feature to prepare devices to be assigned to untrusted guests. Unfortunately, this is not considered a strictly required step for device assignment. The PCI passthrough documentation on the wiki describes alternate ways of preparing devices for assignment, and libvirt uses its own ways as well. Hosts where these \"alternate\" methods are used will still leave the system in a vulnerable state after the device comes back from a guest. An untrusted domain with access to a physical device can DMA into host memory, leading to privilege escalation. Only systems where guests are given direct access to physical devices capable of DMA (PCI pass-through) are vulnerable. Systems which do not use PCI pass-through are not vulnerable." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-20" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/11/26/2", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/11/26/2" }, { "name": "https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-306.html", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-306.html" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20191205 Xen Security Advisory 306 v3 (CVE-2019-19579) - Device quarantine for alternate pci assignment methods", "refsource": "MLIST", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/05/7" }, { "name": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-306.html", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-306.html" }, { "name": "FEDORA-2019-3d7105bd2a", "refsource": "FEDORA", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RJYT5FNGM7JSVHHW6B22TSAATBOAPFPD/" }, { "name": "openSUSE-SU-2020:0011", "refsource": "SUSE", "tags": [], "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00011.html" }, { "name": "DSA-4602", "refsource": "DEBIAN", "tags": [], "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4602" }, { "name": "20200114 [SECURITY] [DSA 4602-1] xen security update", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "tags": [], "url": "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2020/Jan/21" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "acInsufInfo": false, "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "LOCAL", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 7.2, "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "vectorString": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "HIGH", "userInteractionRequired": false }, "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "PHYSICAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 6.8, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 0.9, "impactScore": 5.9 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2020-01-14T01:15Z", "publishedDate": "2019-12-04T22:15Z" } } }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.