GSD-2020-11052

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2020-05-07 00:00
Details
### Impact Brute force vulnerability when using password authentication via Sorcery. The brute force protection submodule will prevent a brute force attack for the defined lockout period, but once expired protection will not be re-enabled until a user or malicious actor logs in successfully. This does not affect users that do not use the built-in brute force protection submodule, nor users that use permanent account lockout. ### Patches Patched as of version `0.15.0`. ### Workarounds Currently no workarounds, other than monkey patching the authenticate method provided by Sorcery or upgrading to version `0.15.0`.
Aliases

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2020-11052",
    "description": "In Sorcery before 0.15.0, there is a brute force vulnerability when using password authentication via Sorcery. The brute force protection submodule will prevent a brute force attack for the defined lockout period, but once expired, protection will not be re-enabled until a user or malicious actor logs in successfully. This does not affect users that do not use the built-in brute force protection submodule, nor users that use permanent account lockout. This has been patched in 0.15.0.",
    "id": "GSD-2020-11052"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "package": {
            "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
            "name": "sorcery",
            "purl": "pkg:gem/sorcery"
          }
        }
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2020-11052",
        "GHSA-jc8m-cxhj-668x"
      ],
      "details": "### Impact\nBrute force vulnerability when using password authentication via Sorcery.\nThe brute force protection submodule will prevent a brute force attack for\nthe defined lockout period, but once expired protection will not be re-enabled\nuntil a user or malicious actor logs in successfully. This does not affect users\nthat do not use the built-in brute force protection submodule, nor users that use\npermanent account lockout.\n\n### Patches\nPatched as of version `0.15.0`.\n\n### Workarounds\nCurrently no workarounds, other than monkey patching the authenticate method\nprovided by Sorcery or upgrading to version `0.15.0`.",
      "id": "GSD-2020-11052",
      "modified": "2020-05-07T00:00:00.000Z",
      "published": "2020-05-07T00:00:00.000Z",
      "references": [
        {
          "type": "WEB",
          "url": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/security/advisories/GHSA-jc8m-cxhj-668x"
        }
      ],
      "schema_version": "1.4.0",
      "severity": [
        {
          "score": 8.3,
          "type": "CVSS_V3"
        }
      ],
      "summary": "Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts in Sorcery"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "ID": "CVE-2020-11052",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC",
        "TITLE": "Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts in Sorcery"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "Sorcery",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "\u003c 0.15.0"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "Sorcery"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "In Sorcery before 0.15.0, there is a brute force vulnerability when using password authentication via Sorcery. The brute force protection submodule will prevent a brute force attack for the defined lockout period, but once expired, protection will not be re-enabled until a user or malicious actor logs in successfully. This does not affect users that do not use the built-in brute force protection submodule, nor users that use permanent account lockout. This has been patched in 0.15.0."
          }
        ]
      },
      "impact": {
        "cvss": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 8.3,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        }
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/security/advisories/GHSA-jc8m-cxhj-668x",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/security/advisories/GHSA-jc8m-cxhj-668x"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/issues/231",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/issues/231"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/pull/235",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/pull/235"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/commit/0f116d223826895a73b12492f17486e5d54ab7a7",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/commit/0f116d223826895a73b12492f17486e5d54ab7a7"
          }
        ]
      },
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-jc8m-cxhj-668x",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      }
    },
    "github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db": {
      "cve": "2020-11052",
      "cvss_v3": 8.3,
      "date": "2020-05-07",
      "description": "### Impact\nBrute force vulnerability when using password authentication via Sorcery.\nThe brute force protection submodule will prevent a brute force attack for\nthe defined lockout period, but once expired protection will not be re-enabled\nuntil a user or malicious actor logs in successfully. This does not affect users\nthat do not use the built-in brute force protection submodule, nor users that use\npermanent account lockout.\n\n### Patches\nPatched as of version `0.15.0`.\n\n### Workarounds\nCurrently no workarounds, other than monkey patching the authenticate method\nprovided by Sorcery or upgrading to version `0.15.0`.",
      "gem": "sorcery",
      "ghsa": "jc8m-cxhj-668x",
      "patched_versions": [
        "\u003e= 0.15.0"
      ],
      "title": "Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts in Sorcery",
      "url": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/security/advisories/GHSA-jc8m-cxhj-668x"
    },
    "gitlab.com": {
      "advisories": [
        {
          "affected_range": "\u003c0.15.0",
          "affected_versions": "All versions before 0.15.0",
          "cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
          "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "cwe_ids": [
            "CWE-1035",
            "CWE-307",
            "CWE-937"
          ],
          "date": "2020-05-13",
          "description": "In Sorcery, there is a brute force vulnerability when using password authentication via Sorcery. The brute force protection submodule will prevent a brute force attack for the defined lockout period, but once expired, protection will not be re-enabled until a user or malicious actor logs in successfully. This does not affect users that do not use the built-in brute force protection submodule, nor users that use permanent account lockout.",
          "fixed_versions": [
            "0.15.0"
          ],
          "identifier": "CVE-2020-11052",
          "identifiers": [
            "CVE-2020-11052",
            "GHSA-jc8m-cxhj-668x"
          ],
          "not_impacted": "All versions starting from 0.15.0",
          "package_slug": "gem/sorcery",
          "pubdate": "2020-05-07",
          "solution": "Upgrade to version 0.15.0 or above.",
          "title": "Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts",
          "urls": [
            "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-11052"
          ],
          "uuid": "80dc73a5-6c4b-4060-b02e-546ba41e63f3"
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:sorcery_project:sorcery:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndExcluding": "0.15.0",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2020-11052"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "In Sorcery before 0.15.0, there is a brute force vulnerability when using password authentication via Sorcery. The brute force protection submodule will prevent a brute force attack for the defined lockout period, but once expired, protection will not be re-enabled until a user or malicious actor logs in successfully. This does not affect users that do not use the built-in brute force protection submodule, nor users that use permanent account lockout. This has been patched in 0.15.0."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-307"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/security/advisories/GHSA-jc8m-cxhj-668x",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/security/advisories/GHSA-jc8m-cxhj-668x"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/issues/231",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/issues/231"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/commit/0f116d223826895a73b12492f17486e5d54ab7a7",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/commit/0f116d223826895a73b12492f17486e5d54ab7a7"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/pull/235",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/pull/235"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "acInsufInfo": false,
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.0,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 9.8,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
          "impactScore": 5.9
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2020-05-13T13:59Z",
      "publishedDate": "2020-05-07T21:15Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…