GSD-2020-15566

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21
Details
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.13.x, allowing guest OS users to cause a host OS crash because of incorrect error handling in event-channel port allocation. The allocation of an event-channel port may fail for multiple reasons: (1) port is already in use, (2) the memory allocation failed, or (3) the port we try to allocate is higher than what is supported by the ABI (e.g., 2L or FIFO) used by the guest or the limit set by an administrator (max_event_channels in xl cfg). Due to the missing error checks, only (1) will be considered an error. All the other cases will provide a valid port and will result in a crash when trying to access the event channel. When the administrator configured a guest to allow more than 1023 event channels, that guest may be able to crash the host. When Xen is out-of-memory, allocation of new event channels will result in crashing the host rather than reporting an error. Xen versions 4.10 and later are affected. All architectures are affected. The default configuration, when guests are created with xl/libxl, is not vulnerable, because of the default event-channel limit.
Aliases
Aliases

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2020-15566",
    "description": "An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.13.x, allowing guest OS users to cause a host OS crash because of incorrect error handling in event-channel port allocation. The allocation of an event-channel port may fail for multiple reasons: (1) port is already in use, (2) the memory allocation failed, or (3) the port we try to allocate is higher than what is supported by the ABI (e.g., 2L or FIFO) used by the guest or the limit set by an administrator (max_event_channels in xl cfg). Due to the missing error checks, only (1) will be considered an error. All the other cases will provide a valid port and will result in a crash when trying to access the event channel. When the administrator configured a guest to allow more than 1023 event channels, that guest may be able to crash the host. When Xen is out-of-memory, allocation of new event channels will result in crashing the host rather than reporting an error. Xen versions 4.10 and later are affected. All architectures are affected. The default configuration, when guests are created with xl/libxl, is not vulnerable, because of the default event-channel limit.",
    "id": "GSD-2020-15566",
    "references": [
      "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-15566.html",
      "https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4723",
      "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2020-15566"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2020-15566"
      ],
      "details": "An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.13.x, allowing guest OS users to cause a host OS crash because of incorrect error handling in event-channel port allocation. The allocation of an event-channel port may fail for multiple reasons: (1) port is already in use, (2) the memory allocation failed, or (3) the port we try to allocate is higher than what is supported by the ABI (e.g., 2L or FIFO) used by the guest or the limit set by an administrator (max_event_channels in xl cfg). Due to the missing error checks, only (1) will be considered an error. All the other cases will provide a valid port and will result in a crash when trying to access the event channel. When the administrator configured a guest to allow more than 1023 event channels, that guest may be able to crash the host. When Xen is out-of-memory, allocation of new event channels will result in crashing the host rather than reporting an error. Xen versions 4.10 and later are affected. All architectures are affected. The default configuration, when guests are created with xl/libxl, is not vulnerable, because of the default event-channel limit.",
      "id": "GSD-2020-15566",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:43.962532Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2020-15566",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.13.x, allowing guest OS users to cause a host OS crash because of incorrect error handling in event-channel port allocation. The allocation of an event-channel port may fail for multiple reasons: (1) port is already in use, (2) the memory allocation failed, or (3) the port we try to allocate is higher than what is supported by the ABI (e.g., 2L or FIFO) used by the guest or the limit set by an administrator (max_event_channels in xl cfg). Due to the missing error checks, only (1) will be considered an error. All the other cases will provide a valid port and will result in a crash when trying to access the event channel. When the administrator configured a guest to allow more than 1023 event channels, that guest may be able to crash the host. When Xen is out-of-memory, allocation of new event channels will result in crashing the host rather than reporting an error. Xen versions 4.10 and later are affected. All architectures are affected. The default configuration, when guests are created with xl/libxl, is not vulnerable, because of the default event-channel limit."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-317.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-317.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20200707 Xen Security Advisory 317 v3 (CVE-2020-15566) - Incorrect error handling in event channel port allocation",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/07/07/2"
          },
          {
            "name": "DSA-4723",
            "refsource": "DEBIAN",
            "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4723"
          },
          {
            "name": "openSUSE-SU-2020:0965",
            "refsource": "SUSE",
            "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00024.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "FEDORA-2020-fbc13516af",
            "refsource": "FEDORA",
            "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VB3QJJZV23Z2IDYEMIHELWYSQBUEW6JP/"
          },
          {
            "name": "openSUSE-SU-2020:0985",
            "refsource": "SUSE",
            "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00031.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "FEDORA-2020-76cf2b0f0a",
            "refsource": "FEDORA",
            "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MXESCOVI7AVRNC7HEAMFM7PMEO6D3AUH/"
          },
          {
            "name": "GLSA-202007-02",
            "refsource": "GENTOO",
            "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202007-02"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:xen:xen:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "4.13.1",
                "versionStartIncluding": "4.10.0",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          },
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2020-15566"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.13.x, allowing guest OS users to cause a host OS crash because of incorrect error handling in event-channel port allocation. The allocation of an event-channel port may fail for multiple reasons: (1) port is already in use, (2) the memory allocation failed, or (3) the port we try to allocate is higher than what is supported by the ABI (e.g., 2L or FIFO) used by the guest or the limit set by an administrator (max_event_channels in xl cfg). Due to the missing error checks, only (1) will be considered an error. All the other cases will provide a valid port and will result in a crash when trying to access the event channel. When the administrator configured a guest to allow more than 1023 event channels, that guest may be able to crash the host. When Xen is out-of-memory, allocation of new event channels will result in crashing the host rather than reporting an error. Xen versions 4.10 and later are affected. All architectures are affected. The default configuration, when guests are created with xl/libxl, is not vulnerable, because of the default event-channel limit."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-755"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-317.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-317.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20200707 Xen Security Advisory 317 v3 (CVE-2020-15566) - Incorrect error handling in event channel port allocation",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/07/07/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "DSA-4723",
              "refsource": "DEBIAN",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4723"
            },
            {
              "name": "openSUSE-SU-2020:0965",
              "refsource": "SUSE",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00024.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "FEDORA-2020-fbc13516af",
              "refsource": "FEDORA",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VB3QJJZV23Z2IDYEMIHELWYSQBUEW6JP/"
            },
            {
              "name": "openSUSE-SU-2020:0985",
              "refsource": "SUSE",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00031.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "FEDORA-2020-76cf2b0f0a",
              "refsource": "FEDORA",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MXESCOVI7AVRNC7HEAMFM7PMEO6D3AUH/"
            },
            {
              "name": "GLSA-202007-02",
              "refsource": "GENTOO",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202007-02"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "acInsufInfo": false,
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
            "accessVector": "LOCAL",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
            "baseScore": 4.7,
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 3.4,
          "impactScore": 6.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "CHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 2.0,
          "impactScore": 4.0
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2020-08-18T15:05Z",
      "publishedDate": "2020-07-07T13:15Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…