gsd-2021-3139
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:23
Details
In Open-iSCSI tcmu-runner 1.3.x, 1.4.x, and 1.5.x through 1.5.2, xcopy_locate_udev in tcmur_cmd_handler.c lacks a check for transport-layer restrictions, allowing remote attackers to read or write files via directory traversal in an XCOPY request. For example, an attack can occur over a network if the attacker has access to one iSCSI LUN. NOTE: relative to CVE-2020-28374, this is a similar mistake in a different algorithm.
Aliases
Aliases
{ GSD: { alias: "CVE-2021-3139", description: "In Open-iSCSI tcmu-runner 1.3.x, 1.4.x, and 1.5.x through 1.5.2, xcopy_locate_udev in tcmur_cmd_handler.c lacks a check for transport-layer restrictions, allowing remote attackers to read or write files via directory traversal in an XCOPY request. For example, an attack can occur over a network if the attacker has access to one iSCSI LUN. NOTE: relative to CVE-2020-28374, this is a similar mistake in a different algorithm.", id: "GSD-2021-3139", references: [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3139.html", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:1518", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:1452", "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-3139", ], }, gsd: { metadata: { exploitCode: "unknown", remediation: "unknown", reportConfidence: "confirmed", type: "vulnerability", }, osvSchema: { aliases: [ "CVE-2021-3139", ], details: "In Open-iSCSI tcmu-runner 1.3.x, 1.4.x, and 1.5.x through 1.5.2, xcopy_locate_udev in tcmur_cmd_handler.c lacks a check for transport-layer restrictions, allowing remote attackers to read or write files via directory traversal in an XCOPY request. For example, an attack can occur over a network if the attacker has access to one iSCSI LUN. NOTE: relative to CVE-2020-28374, this is a similar mistake in a different algorithm.", id: "GSD-2021-3139", modified: "2023-12-13T01:23:35.088429Z", schema_version: "1.4.0", }, }, namespaces: { "cve.org": { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org", ID: "CVE-2021-3139", STATE: "PUBLIC", }, affects: { vendor: { vendor_data: [ { product: { product_data: [ { product_name: "n/a", version: { version_data: [ { version_value: "n/a", }, ], }, }, ], }, vendor_name: "n/a", }, ], }, }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "In Open-iSCSI tcmu-runner 1.3.x, 1.4.x, and 1.5.x through 1.5.2, xcopy_locate_udev in tcmur_cmd_handler.c lacks a check for transport-layer restrictions, allowing remote attackers to read or write files via directory traversal in an XCOPY request. For example, an attack can occur over a network if the attacker has access to one iSCSI LUN. NOTE: relative to CVE-2020-28374, this is a similar mistake in a different algorithm.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "eng", value: "n/a", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178372", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178372", }, { name: "https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=844938", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=844938", }, { name: "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/12/12", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/12/12", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20210113 Re: CVE-2020-28374: Linux SCSI target (LIO) unrestricted copy offload", refsource: "MLIST", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/13/5", }, { name: "https://github.com/open-iscsi/tcmu-runner/pull/644", refsource: "CONFIRM", url: "https://github.com/open-iscsi/tcmu-runner/pull/644", }, ], }, }, "nvd.nist.gov": { configurations: { CVE_data_version: "4.0", nodes: [ { children: [], cpe_match: [ { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:tcmu-runner_project:tcmu-runner:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], versionEndIncluding: "1.5.2", versionStartIncluding: "1.3.0", vulnerable: true, }, ], operator: "OR", }, ], }, cve: { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org", ID: "CVE-2021-3139", }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "en", value: "In Open-iSCSI tcmu-runner 1.3.x, 1.4.x, and 1.5.x through 1.5.2, xcopy_locate_udev in tcmur_cmd_handler.c lacks a check for transport-layer restrictions, allowing remote attackers to read or write files via directory traversal in an XCOPY request. For example, an attack can occur over a network if the attacker has access to one iSCSI LUN. NOTE: relative to CVE-2020-28374, this is a similar mistake in a different algorithm.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-22", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178372", refsource: "MISC", tags: [ "Issue Tracking", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178372", }, { name: "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/12/12", refsource: "MISC", tags: [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/12/12", }, { name: "https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=844938", refsource: "MISC", tags: [ "Issue Tracking", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=844938", }, { name: "https://github.com/open-iscsi/tcmu-runner/pull/644", refsource: "CONFIRM", tags: [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://github.com/open-iscsi/tcmu-runner/pull/644", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20210113 Re: CVE-2020-28374: Linux SCSI target (LIO) unrestricted copy offload", refsource: "MLIST", tags: [ "Mailing List", "Mitigation", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/13/5", }, ], }, }, impact: { baseMetricV2: { acInsufInfo: false, cvssV2: { accessComplexity: "LOW", accessVector: "NETWORK", authentication: "SINGLE", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 5.5, confidentialityImpact: "PARTIAL", integrityImpact: "PARTIAL", vectorString: "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:N", version: "2.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 8, impactScore: 4.9, obtainAllPrivilege: false, obtainOtherPrivilege: false, obtainUserPrivilege: false, severity: "MEDIUM", userInteractionRequired: false, }, baseMetricV3: { cvssV3: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 8.1, baseSeverity: "HIGH", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "LOW", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 2.8, impactScore: 5.2, }, }, lastModifiedDate: "2021-01-22T18:25Z", publishedDate: "2021-01-13T16:15Z", }, }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.