gsd-2022-24845
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:19
Details
Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In affected versions, the return of `<iface>.returns_int128()` is not validated to fall within the bounds of `int128`. This issue can result in a misinterpretation of the integer value and lead to incorrect behavior. As of v0.3.0, `<iface>.returns_int128()` is validated in simple expressions, but not complex expressions. Users are advised to upgrade. There is no known workaround for this issue.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2022-24845", "description": "Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In affected versions, the return of `\u003ciface\u003e.returns_int128()` is not validated to fall within the bounds of `int128`. This issue can result in a misinterpretation of the integer value and lead to incorrect behavior. As of v0.3.0, `\u003ciface\u003e.returns_int128()` is validated in simple expressions, but not complex expressions. Users are advised to upgrade. There is no known workaround for this issue.", "id": "GSD-2022-24845" }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-24845" ], "details": "Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In affected versions, the return of `\u003ciface\u003e.returns_int128()` is not validated to fall within the bounds of `int128`. This issue can result in a misinterpretation of the integer value and lead to incorrect behavior. As of v0.3.0, `\u003ciface\u003e.returns_int128()` is validated in simple expressions, but not complex expressions. Users are advised to upgrade. There is no known workaround for this issue.", "id": "GSD-2022-24845", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:43.491798Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com", "ID": "CVE-2022-24845", "STATE": "PUBLIC", "TITLE": "Integer bounds error in Vyper" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "vyper", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "\u003c 0.3.2" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "vyperlang" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In affected versions, the return of `\u003ciface\u003e.returns_int128()` is not validated to fall within the bounds of `int128`. This issue can result in a misinterpretation of the integer value and lead to incorrect behavior. As of v0.3.0, `\u003ciface\u003e.returns_int128()` is validated in simple expressions, but not complex expressions. Users are advised to upgrade. There is no known workaround for this issue." } ] }, "impact": { "cvss": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" } }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/049dbdc647b2ce838fae7c188e6bb09cf16e470b", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/049dbdc647b2ce838fae7c188e6bb09cf16e470b" }, { "name": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-j2x6-9323-fp7h", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-j2x6-9323-fp7h" } ] }, "source": { "advisory": "GHSA-j2x6-9323-fp7h", "discovery": "UNKNOWN" } }, "gitlab.com": { "advisories": [ { "affected_range": "\u003c0.3.2", "affected_versions": "All versions before 0.3.2", "cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-1035", "CWE-190", "CWE-937" ], "date": "2023-08-02", "description": "Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In affected versions, the return of `\u003ciface\u003e.returns_int128()` is not validated to fall within the bounds of `int128`. This issue can result in a misinterpretation of the integer value and lead to incorrect behavior. As of v0.3.0, `\u003ciface\u003e.returns_int128()` is validated in simple expressions, but not complex expressions. Users are advised to upgrade. There is no known workaround for this issue.", "fixed_versions": [ "0.3.2" ], "identifier": "CVE-2022-24845", "identifiers": [ "CVE-2022-24845", "GHSA-j2x6-9323-fp7h" ], "not_impacted": "All versions starting from 0.3.2", "package_slug": "pypi/vyper", "pubdate": "2022-04-13", "solution": "Upgrade to version 0.3.2 or above.", "title": "Integer Overflow or Wraparound", "urls": [ "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-j2x6-9323-fp7h", "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-24845", "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/049dbdc647b2ce838fae7c188e6bb09cf16e470b", "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-j2x6-9323-fp7h" ], "uuid": "fa692dd6-1fb5-4f75-9624-ecad928f2192" } ] }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:vyperlang:vyper:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndExcluding": "0.3.2", "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com", "ID": "CVE-2022-24845" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In affected versions, the return of `\u003ciface\u003e.returns_int128()` is not validated to fall within the bounds of `int128`. This issue can result in a misinterpretation of the integer value and lead to incorrect behavior. As of v0.3.0, `\u003ciface\u003e.returns_int128()` is validated in simple expressions, but not complex expressions. Users are advised to upgrade. There is no known workaround for this issue." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-190" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-j2x6-9323-fp7h", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Patch", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-j2x6-9323-fp7h" }, { "name": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/049dbdc647b2ce838fae7c188e6bb09cf16e470b", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/049dbdc647b2ce838fae7c188e6bb09cf16e470b" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "acInsufInfo": false, "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 7.5, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "impactScore": 6.4, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "HIGH", "userInteractionRequired": false }, "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 5.9 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2023-08-02T16:22Z", "publishedDate": "2022-04-13T22:15Z" } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.