gsd-2022-24903
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:19
Details
Rsyslog is a rocket-fast system for log processing. Modules for TCP syslog reception have a potential heap buffer overflow when octet-counted framing is used. This can result in a segfault or some other malfunction. As of our understanding, this vulnerability can not be used for remote code execution. But there may still be a slight chance for experts to do that. The bug occurs when the octet count is read. While there is a check for the maximum number of octets, digits are written to a heap buffer even when the octet count is over the maximum, This can be used to overrun the memory buffer. However, once the sequence of digits stop, no additional characters can be added to the buffer. In our opinion, this makes remote exploits impossible or at least highly complex. Octet-counted framing is one of two potential framing modes. It is relatively uncommon, but enabled by default on receivers. Modules `imtcp`, `imptcp`, `imgssapi`, and `imhttp` are used for regular syslog message reception. It is best practice not to directly expose them to the public. When this practice is followed, the risk is considerably lower. Module `imdiag` is a diagnostics module primarily intended for testbench runs. We do not expect it to be present on any production installation. Octet-counted framing is not very common. Usually, it needs to be specifically enabled at senders. If users do not need it, they can turn it off for the most important modules. This will mitigate the vulnerability.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2022-24903", "description": "Rsyslog is a rocket-fast system for log processing. Modules for TCP syslog reception have a potential heap buffer overflow when octet-counted framing is used. This can result in a segfault or some other malfunction. As of our understanding, this vulnerability can not be used for remote code execution. But there may still be a slight chance for experts to do that. The bug occurs when the octet count is read. While there is a check for the maximum number of octets, digits are written to a heap buffer even when the octet count is over the maximum, This can be used to overrun the memory buffer. However, once the sequence of digits stop, no additional characters can be added to the buffer. In our opinion, this makes remote exploits impossible or at least highly complex. Octet-counted framing is one of two potential framing modes. It is relatively uncommon, but enabled by default on receivers. Modules `imtcp`, `imptcp`, `imgssapi`, and `imhttp` are used for regular syslog message reception. It is best practice not to directly expose them to the public. When this practice is followed, the risk is considerably lower. Module `imdiag` is a diagnostics module primarily intended for testbench runs. We do not expect it to be present on any production installation. Octet-counted framing is not very common. Usually, it needs to be specifically enabled at senders. If users do not need it, they can turn it off for the most important modules. This will mitigate the vulnerability.", "id": "GSD-2022-24903", "references": [ "https://alas.aws.amazon.com/cve/html/CVE-2022-24903.html", "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5150", "https://advisories.mageia.org/CVE-2022-24903.html", "https://linux.oracle.com/cve/CVE-2022-24903.html", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:4795", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:4799", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:4800", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:4801", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:4802", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:4803", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:4808", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:4896", "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-24903.html", "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-24903", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:5439" ] }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-24903" ], "details": "Rsyslog is a rocket-fast system for log processing. Modules for TCP syslog reception have a potential heap buffer overflow when octet-counted framing is used. This can result in a segfault or some other malfunction. As of our understanding, this vulnerability can not be used for remote code execution. But there may still be a slight chance for experts to do that. The bug occurs when the octet count is read. While there is a check for the maximum number of octets, digits are written to a heap buffer even when the octet count is over the maximum, This can be used to overrun the memory buffer. However, once the sequence of digits stop, no additional characters can be added to the buffer. In our opinion, this makes remote exploits impossible or at least highly complex. Octet-counted framing is one of two potential framing modes. It is relatively uncommon, but enabled by default on receivers. Modules `imtcp`, `imptcp`, `imgssapi`, and `imhttp` are used for regular syslog message reception. It is best practice not to directly expose them to the public. When this practice is followed, the risk is considerably lower. Module `imdiag` is a diagnostics module primarily intended for testbench runs. We do not expect it to be present on any production installation. Octet-counted framing is not very common. Usually, it needs to be specifically enabled at senders. If users do not need it, they can turn it off for the most important modules. This will mitigate the vulnerability.", "id": "GSD-2022-24903", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:43.203675Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com", "ID": "CVE-2022-24903", "STATE": "PUBLIC", "TITLE": "Buffer overflow in TCP syslog server (receiver) components in rsyslog" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "rsyslog", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "\u003c 8.2204.1" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "rsyslog" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Rsyslog is a rocket-fast system for log processing. Modules for TCP syslog reception have a potential heap buffer overflow when octet-counted framing is used. This can result in a segfault or some other malfunction. As of our understanding, this vulnerability can not be used for remote code execution. But there may still be a slight chance for experts to do that. The bug occurs when the octet count is read. While there is a check for the maximum number of octets, digits are written to a heap buffer even when the octet count is over the maximum, This can be used to overrun the memory buffer. However, once the sequence of digits stop, no additional characters can be added to the buffer. In our opinion, this makes remote exploits impossible or at least highly complex. Octet-counted framing is one of two potential framing modes. It is relatively uncommon, but enabled by default on receivers. Modules `imtcp`, `imptcp`, `imgssapi`, and `imhttp` are used for regular syslog message reception. It is best practice not to directly expose them to the public. When this practice is followed, the risk is considerably lower. Module `imdiag` is a diagnostics module primarily intended for testbench runs. We do not expect it to be present on any production installation. Octet-counted framing is not very common. Usually, it needs to be specifically enabled at senders. If users do not need it, they can turn it off for the most important modules. This will mitigate the vulnerability." } ] }, "impact": { "cvss": { "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.1, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" } }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/security/advisories/GHSA-ggw7-xr6h-mmr8", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/security/advisories/GHSA-ggw7-xr6h-mmr8" }, { "name": "https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/commit/f211042ecbb472f9d8beb4678a65d272b6f07705", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/commit/f211042ecbb472f9d8beb4678a65d272b6f07705" }, { "name": "FEDORA-2022-f796a28a7b", "refsource": "FEDORA", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GMNNXLCU2UORRVSZO24HL4KMVPK5PHVW/" }, { "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20220520 [SECURITY] [DLA 3016-1] rsyslog security update", "refsource": "MLIST", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00028.html" }, { "name": "DSA-5150", "refsource": "DEBIAN", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5150" }, { "name": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221111-0002/", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221111-0002/" } ] }, "source": { "advisory": "GHSA-ggw7-xr6h-mmr8", "discovery": "UNKNOWN" } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:rsyslog:rsyslog:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndExcluding": "8.2204.1", "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" }, { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:35:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" }, { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" }, { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager:-:*:*:*:*:vmware_vsphere:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com", "ID": "CVE-2022-24903" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Rsyslog is a rocket-fast system for log processing. Modules for TCP syslog reception have a potential heap buffer overflow when octet-counted framing is used. This can result in a segfault or some other malfunction. As of our understanding, this vulnerability can not be used for remote code execution. But there may still be a slight chance for experts to do that. The bug occurs when the octet count is read. While there is a check for the maximum number of octets, digits are written to a heap buffer even when the octet count is over the maximum, This can be used to overrun the memory buffer. However, once the sequence of digits stop, no additional characters can be added to the buffer. In our opinion, this makes remote exploits impossible or at least highly complex. Octet-counted framing is one of two potential framing modes. It is relatively uncommon, but enabled by default on receivers. Modules `imtcp`, `imptcp`, `imgssapi`, and `imhttp` are used for regular syslog message reception. It is best practice not to directly expose them to the public. When this practice is followed, the risk is considerably lower. Module `imdiag` is a diagnostics module primarily intended for testbench runs. We do not expect it to be present on any production installation. Octet-counted framing is not very common. Usually, it needs to be specifically enabled at senders. If users do not need it, they can turn it off for the most important modules. This will mitigate the vulnerability." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-1284" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/security/advisories/GHSA-ggw7-xr6h-mmr8", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/security/advisories/GHSA-ggw7-xr6h-mmr8" }, { "name": "https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/commit/f211042ecbb472f9d8beb4678a65d272b6f07705", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/commit/f211042ecbb472f9d8beb4678a65d272b6f07705" }, { "name": "FEDORA-2022-f796a28a7b", "refsource": "FEDORA", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GMNNXLCU2UORRVSZO24HL4KMVPK5PHVW/" }, { "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20220520 [SECURITY] [DLA 3016-1] rsyslog security update", "refsource": "MLIST", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00028.html" }, { "name": "DSA-5150", "refsource": "DEBIAN", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5150" }, { "name": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221111-0002/", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221111-0002/" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "acInsufInfo": false, "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 6.8, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "impactScore": 6.4, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "MEDIUM", "userInteractionRequired": false }, "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.1, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 2.2, "impactScore": 5.9 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2023-06-23T19:43Z", "publishedDate": "2022-05-06T00:15Z" } } }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.