gsd-2023-52505
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2024-02-21 06:01
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
phy: lynx-28g: serialize concurrent phy_set_mode_ext() calls to shared registers
The protocol converter configuration registers PCC8, PCCC, PCCD
(implemented by the driver), as well as others, control protocol
converters from multiple lanes (each represented as a different
struct phy). So, if there are simultaneous calls to phy_set_mode_ext()
to lanes sharing the same PCC register (either for the "old" or for the
"new" protocol), corruption of the values programmed to hardware is
possible, because lynx_28g_rmw() has no locking.
Add a spinlock in the struct lynx_28g_priv shared by all lanes, and take
the global spinlock from the phy_ops :: set_mode() implementation. There
are no other callers which modify PCC registers.
Aliases
{ "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-52505" ], "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nphy: lynx-28g: serialize concurrent phy_set_mode_ext() calls to shared registers\n\nThe protocol converter configuration registers PCC8, PCCC, PCCD\n(implemented by the driver), as well as others, control protocol\nconverters from multiple lanes (each represented as a different\nstruct phy). So, if there are simultaneous calls to phy_set_mode_ext()\nto lanes sharing the same PCC register (either for the \"old\" or for the\n\"new\" protocol), corruption of the values programmed to hardware is\npossible, because lynx_28g_rmw() has no locking.\n\nAdd a spinlock in the struct lynx_28g_priv shared by all lanes, and take\nthe global spinlock from the phy_ops :: set_mode() implementation. There\nare no other callers which modify PCC registers.", "id": "GSD-2023-52505", "modified": "2024-02-21T06:01:53.345520Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@kernel.org", "ID": "CVE-2023-52505", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "Linux", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_affected": "\u003c", "version_name": "8f73b37cf3fb", "version_value": "6f901f8448c6" }, { "version_value": "not down converted", "x_cve_json_5_version_data": { "defaultStatus": "affected", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "5.18" }, { "lessThan": "5.18", "status": "unaffected", "version": "0", "versionType": "custom" }, { "lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*", "status": "unaffected", "version": "6.1.59", "versionType": "custom" }, { "lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*", "status": "unaffected", "version": "6.5.8", "versionType": "custom" }, { "lessThanOrEqual": "*", "status": "unaffected", "version": "6.6", "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix" } ] } } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "Linux" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nphy: lynx-28g: serialize concurrent phy_set_mode_ext() calls to shared registers\n\nThe protocol converter configuration registers PCC8, PCCC, PCCD\n(implemented by the driver), as well as others, control protocol\nconverters from multiple lanes (each represented as a different\nstruct phy). So, if there are simultaneous calls to phy_set_mode_ext()\nto lanes sharing the same PCC register (either for the \"old\" or for the\n\"new\" protocol), corruption of the values programmed to hardware is\npossible, because lynx_28g_rmw() has no locking.\n\nAdd a spinlock in the struct lynx_28g_priv shared by all lanes, and take\nthe global spinlock from the phy_ops :: set_mode() implementation. There\nare no other callers which modify PCC registers." } ] }, "generator": { "engine": "bippy-4986f5686161" }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f901f8448c6b25ed843796b114471d2a3fc5dfb", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f901f8448c6b25ed843796b114471d2a3fc5dfb" }, { "name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c2d7c79898b427d263c64a4841987eec131f2d4e", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c2d7c79898b427d263c64a4841987eec131f2d4e" }, { "name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/139ad1143151a07be93bf741d4ea7c89e59f89ce", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/139ad1143151a07be93bf741d4ea7c89e59f89ce" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "cve": { "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nphy: lynx-28g: serialize concurrent phy_set_mode_ext() calls to shared registers\n\nThe protocol converter configuration registers PCC8, PCCC, PCCD\n(implemented by the driver), as well as others, control protocol\nconverters from multiple lanes (each represented as a different\nstruct phy). So, if there are simultaneous calls to phy_set_mode_ext()\nto lanes sharing the same PCC register (either for the \"old\" or for the\n\"new\" protocol), corruption of the values programmed to hardware is\npossible, because lynx_28g_rmw() has no locking.\n\nAdd a spinlock in the struct lynx_28g_priv shared by all lanes, and take\nthe global spinlock from the phy_ops :: set_mode() implementation. There\nare no other callers which modify PCC registers." } ], "id": "CVE-2023-52505", "lastModified": "2024-03-04T13:58:23.447", "metrics": {}, "published": "2024-03-02T22:15:47.350", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/139ad1143151a07be93bf741d4ea7c89e59f89ce" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f901f8448c6b25ed843796b114471d2a3fc5dfb" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c2d7c79898b427d263c64a4841987eec131f2d4e" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis" } } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.