GSD-2023-5655
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:20{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2023-5655",
"id": "GSD-2023-5655"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-5655"
],
"details": "** REJECT ** it is a duplicate",
"id": "GSD-2023-5655",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:50.868157Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@wordfence.com",
"ID": "CVE-2023-5655",
"STATE": "REJECT"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "** REJECT **\nDO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-5534. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2023-5534. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2023-5534 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage.\n"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"cve": {
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rejected reason: ** REJECT **\nDO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-5534. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2023-5534. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2023-5534 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage.\n"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-5655",
"lastModified": "2024-01-23T23:15:08.403",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2023-10-20T02:15:08.367",
"references": [],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
"vulnStatus": "Rejected"
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…